LMNX vs. CRMG
LMNX (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long LMND ETF) and CRMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LMNX charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CRMG.
Performance
LMNX vs. CRMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LMNX achieves a -47.89% return, which is significantly higher than CRMG's -64.33% return.
LMNX
- 1D
- -4.46%
- 1M
- 5.96%
- 6M
- -57.78%
- YTD
- -47.89%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRMG
- 1D
- 6.77%
- 1M
- 10.88%
- 6M
- -53.43%
- YTD
- -64.33%
- 1Y
- -65.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LMNX vs. CRMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LMNX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long LMND ETF | -47.89% | 55.19% |
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF | -64.33% | 19.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between LMNX and CRMG is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2025 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LMNX vs. CRMG — Risk / Return Rank
LMNX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CRMG
LMNX vs. CRMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long LMND ETF (LMNX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LMNX | CRMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.85 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.87 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.45 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LMNX vs. CRMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LMNX drawdown since its inception was -79.62%, roughly equal to the maximum CRMG drawdown of -79.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMNX and CRMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LMNX | CRMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.62% | -79.83% | +0.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -75.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.13% | -73.90% | +3.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.54% | -41.04% | -4.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 45.39% | — |
Volatility
LMNX vs. CRMG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LMNX | CRMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 23.42% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 64.24% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 168.18% | 77.97% | +90.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 168.18% | 75.77% | +92.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 168.18% | 75.77% | +92.41% |
LMNX vs. CRMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
LMNX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than CRMG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
LMNX vs. CRMG - Dividend Comparison
Neither LMNX nor CRMG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LMNX and CRMG have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for LMNX.
LMNX and CRMG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance ETFs and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for LMNX and 0.75% for CRMG.
Find the right allocation for LMNX and CRMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer