LMND vs. PL
LMND (Lemonade, Inc.) and PL (Planet Labs PBC) are both stocks. LMND operates in Insurance - Property & Casualty (Financial Services), while PL operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, LMND returned -11.55%/yr vs 25.63%/yr for PL. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LMND vs. PL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LMND achieves a -19.23% return, which is significantly lower than PL's 57.96% return.
LMND
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 8.74%
- YTD
- -19.23%
- 6M
- -26.15%
- 1Y
- 36.46%
- 3Y*
- 39.69%
- 5Y*
- -11.55%
- 10Y*
- —
PL
- 1D
- -8.84%
- 1M
- -23.54%
- YTD
- 57.96%
- 6M
- 70.78%
- 1Y
- 470.51%
- 3Y*
- 106.65%
- 5Y*
- 25.63%
- 10Y*
- —
LMND vs. PL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMND Lemonade, Inc. | -19.23% | 94.06% | 127.40% | 17.91% | -67.51% | -55.16% |
PL Planet Labs PBC | 57.96% | 388.12% | 63.56% | -43.22% | -29.27% | -37.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between LMND and PL is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2021 | 0.47 |
The correlation between LMND and PL shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.48 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LMND:
$4.39B
PL:
$10.76B
LMND:
-$1.88
PL:
-$1.17
LMND:
5.18
PL:
29.61
LMND:
8.47
PL:
24.26
LMND:
$821.10M
PL:
$335.61M
LMND:
$390.70M
PL:
$186.28M
LMND:
-$120.70M
PL:
-$125.70M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LMND vs. PL — Risk / Return Rank
LMND
PL
LMND vs. PL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lemonade, Inc. (LMND) and Planet Labs PBC (PL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LMND | PL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.55 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.77 | 11.79 | -11.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.48 | 36.80 | -35.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LMND vs. PL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LMND drawdown since its inception was -94.23%, which is greater than PL's maximum drawdown of -85.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMND and PL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LMND | PL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.23% | -85.73% | -8.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.70% | -40.23% | -7.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.10% | -55.17% | -0.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -90.63% | -85.73% | -4.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -68.63% | -39.40% | -29.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.02% | -49.90% | -23.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.64% | 12.88% | +11.76% |
Volatility
LMND vs. PL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lemonade, Inc. (LMND) is 15.88%, while Planet Labs PBC (PL) has a volatility of 39.48%. This indicates that LMND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LMND | PL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.88% | 39.48% | -23.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.78% | 78.71% | -24.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 84.53% | 102.61% | -18.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 82.20% | 80.98% | +1.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 86.51% | 79.91% | +6.60% |
Dividends
LMND vs. PL - Dividend Comparison
Neither LMND nor PL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
LMND vs. PL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lemonade, Inc. and Planet Labs PBC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
LMND and PL have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PL has higher volatility (39.48%) compared to LMND (15.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMND dropped -94.23% vs PL's -85.73%.
PL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.62 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LMND and PL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer