LMND vs. IONQ
LMND (Lemonade, Inc.) and IONQ (IonQ, Inc.) are both stocks. LMND operates in Insurance - Property & Casualty (Financial Services), while IONQ operates in Computer Hardware (Technology). Over the past 5 years, LMND returned -11.55%/yr vs 40.49%/yr for IONQ. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LMND vs. IONQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LMND achieves a -19.23% return, which is significantly lower than IONQ's 28.93% return.
LMND
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 8.74%
- YTD
- -19.23%
- 6M
- -26.15%
- 1Y
- 36.46%
- 3Y*
- 39.69%
- 5Y*
- -11.55%
- 10Y*
- —
IONQ
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 4.69%
- YTD
- 28.93%
- 6M
- 14.90%
- 1Y
- 49.44%
- 3Y*
- 75.90%
- 5Y*
- 40.49%
- 10Y*
- —
LMND vs. IONQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMND Lemonade, Inc. | -19.23% | 94.06% | 127.40% | 17.91% | -67.51% | -65.62% |
IONQ IonQ, Inc. | 28.93% | 7.42% | 237.13% | 259.13% | -79.34% | 50.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between LMND and IONQ is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2021 | 0.49 |
The correlation between LMND and IONQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
LMND:
$4.39B
IONQ:
$21.48B
LMND:
-$1.88
IONQ:
$0.86
LMND:
5.18
IONQ:
99.37
LMND:
8.47
IONQ:
4.32
LMND:
$821.10M
IONQ:
$187.12M
LMND:
$390.70M
IONQ:
$71.25M
LMND:
-$120.70M
IONQ:
$405.86M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LMND vs. IONQ — Risk / Return Rank
LMND
IONQ
LMND vs. IONQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lemonade, Inc. (LMND) and IonQ, Inc. (IONQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LMND | IONQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.16 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.77 | 0.73 | +0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.48 | 1.33 | +0.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LMND vs. IONQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LMND drawdown since its inception was -94.23%, roughly equal to the maximum IONQ drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMND and IONQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LMND | IONQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.23% | -90.00% | -4.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.70% | -67.61% | +19.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.10% | -67.61% | +11.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -90.63% | -90.00% | -0.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -68.63% | -29.53% | -39.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.02% | -50.88% | -22.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.64% | 37.20% | -12.56% |
Volatility
LMND vs. IONQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lemonade, Inc. (LMND) is 15.88%, while IonQ, Inc. (IONQ) has a volatility of 31.60%. This indicates that LMND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IONQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LMND | IONQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.88% | 31.60% | -15.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.78% | 68.80% | -15.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 84.53% | 93.28% | -8.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 82.20% | 100.48% | -18.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 86.51% | 97.53% | -11.02% |
Dividends
LMND vs. IONQ - Dividend Comparison
Neither LMND nor IONQ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
LMND vs. IONQ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lemonade, Inc. and IonQ, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
LMND and IONQ have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IONQ has higher volatility (31.60%) compared to LMND (15.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMND dropped -94.23% vs IONQ's -90.00%.
IONQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.53 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LMND and IONQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer