PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LMISX vs. SVPFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LMISX vs. SVPFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin U.S. Large Cap Equity Fund (LMISX) and Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund (SVPFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMISX achieves a 10.35% return, which is significantly higher than SVPFX's 1.38% return.


LMISX

1D
-0.52%
1M
4.47%
YTD
10.35%
6M
10.89%
1Y
29.31%
3Y*
24.82%
5Y*
14.07%
10Y*
15.21%

SVPFX

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.10%
YTD
1.38%
6M
1.85%
1Y
4.65%
3Y*
4.37%
5Y*
2.06%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMISX vs. SVPFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
LMISX
Franklin U.S. Large Cap Equity Fund
10.35%18.05%29.58%27.88%-20.61%18.10%
SVPFX
Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund
1.38%4.19%3.82%5.30%-4.37%0.78%

Correlation

The correlation between LMISX and SVPFX is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2021

0.11

The correlation between LMISX and SVPFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (5 years) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LMISX vs. SVPFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMISX
LMISX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
LMISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMISX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
LMISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMISX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

SVPFX
SVPFX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SVPFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SVPFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SVPFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
SVPFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
SVPFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMISX vs. SVPFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Large Cap Equity Fund (LMISX) and Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund (SVPFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LMISXSVPFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.51

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

3.88

-0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.85

13.16

+2.69

LMISX vs. SVPFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMISX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the SVPFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMISX and SVPFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LMISXSVPFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

2.29

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.38

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.39

+0.18

Drawdowns

LMISX vs. SVPFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMISX drawdown since its inception was -50.34%, which is greater than SVPFX's maximum drawdown of -6.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMISX and SVPFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LMISXSVPFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.34%

-6.37%

-43.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.69%

-1.33%

-7.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.22%

-5.32%

-14.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.11%

-6.37%

-19.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.72%

-0.30%

-0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.61%

-1.93%

-5.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

0.43%

+1.42%

Volatility

LMISX vs. SVPFX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin U.S. Large Cap Equity Fund (LMISX) has a higher volatility of 2.81% compared to Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund (SVPFX) at 0.67%. This indicates that LMISX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SVPFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LMISXSVPFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.81%

0.67%

+2.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.92%

1.47%

+7.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.91%

2.26%

+9.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.66%

5.60%

+12.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.78%

5.51%

+13.27%

LMISX vs. SVPFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMISX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than SVPFX's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

LMISX vs. SVPFX - Dividend Comparison

LMISX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, more than SVPFX's 2.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LMISX
Franklin U.S. Large Cap Equity Fund
3.72%4.11%3.97%7.68%0.95%25.55%3.53%8.42%17.16%6.53%1.42%6.23%
SVPFX
Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund
2.47%1.83%4.37%4.29%0.76%0.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LMISX and SVPFX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LMISX has higher volatility (2.81%) compared to SVPFX (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMISX dropped -50.34% vs SVPFX's -6.37%.

LMISX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LMISX and SVPFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer