LMISX vs. NWAUX

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

LMISX (Franklin U.S. Large Cap Equity Fund) and NWAUX (Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, LMISX returned 13.61%/yr vs 9.31%/yr for NWAUX. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LMISX charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for NWAUX.

Performance

LMISX vs. NWAUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin U.S. Large Cap Equity Fund (LMISX) and Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund (NWAUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMISX achieves a 10.96% return, which is significantly higher than NWAUX's 5.82% return.

LMISX

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: 1.70%
• 6M: 9.30%
• YTD: 10.96%
• 1Y: 24.80%
• 3Y*: 22.64%
• 5Y*: 13.61%
• 10Y*: 15.02%

NWAUX

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: -0.35%
• 6M: 6.28%
• YTD: 5.82%
• 1Y: 4.61%
• 3Y*: 11.61%
• 5Y*: 9.31%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMISX vs. NWAUX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
LMISX Franklin U.S. Large Cap Equity Fund	10.96%	18.05%	29.58%	27.88%	-20.61%	27.70%
NWAUX Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund	5.82%	-4.92%	27.90%	18.30%	-3.23%	22.65%

Correlation

The correlation between LMISX and NWAUX is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.16
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.52
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2021	0.66

The correlation between LMISX and NWAUX shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.66 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LMISX vs. NWAUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMISX

LMISX Risk / Return Rank: 79
LMISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
LMISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
LMISX Omega Ratio Rank: 73
LMISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
LMISX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

NWAUX

NWAUX Risk / Return Rank: 8
NWAUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
NWAUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
NWAUX Omega Ratio Rank: 8
NWAUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
NWAUX Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMISX vs. NWAUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Large Cap Equity Fund (LMISX) and Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund (NWAUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LMISX	NWAUX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.01	0.47	+1.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.78	0.75	+2.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.08	+0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.92	0.58	+2.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.07	1.40	+11.67

LMISX vs. NWAUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMISX Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is higher than the NWAUX Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMISX and NWAUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LMISX vs. NWAUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMISX drawdown since its inception was -50.34%, which is greater than NWAUX's maximum drawdown of -21.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMISX and NWAUX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LMISX	NWAUX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.34%	-21.07%	-29.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.69%	-8.55%	-0.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.22%	-19.31%	-0.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.11%	-21.07%	-5.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.27%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.76%	-10.32%	+9.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.57%	-7.00%	-0.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.94%	3.55%	-1.61%

Volatility

LMISX vs. NWAUX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin U.S. Large Cap Equity Fund (LMISX) is 4.06%, while Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund (NWAUX) has a volatility of 4.53%. This indicates that LMISX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NWAUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LMISX	NWAUX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.06%	4.53%	-0.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.93%	8.36%	+1.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.63%	10.67%	+1.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.76%	16.17%	+1.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.76%	15.89%	+2.87%

LMISX vs. NWAUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMISX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than NWAUX's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

LMISX vs. NWAUX - Dividend Comparison

LMISX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.31%, more than NWAUX's 4.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LMISX Franklin U.S. Large Cap Equity Fund	5.31%	4.11%	3.97%	7.68%	0.95%	25.55%	3.53%	8.42%	17.16%	6.53%	1.42%	6.23%
NWAUX Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund	4.92%	4.35%	13.58%	0.40%	1.93%	0.60%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LMISX and NWAUX in my portfolio?

LMISX and NWAUX have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LMISX or NWAUX?

NWAUX has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to LMISX (4.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMISX dropped -50.34% vs NWAUX's -21.07%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LMISX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.