LMISX vs. MCEMX

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

LMISX (Franklin U.S. Large Cap Equity Fund) and MCEMX (Martin Currie Emerging Markets Fund) are both mutual funds - LMISX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Legg Mason, while MCEMX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund managed by Legg Mason. Over the past 10 years, LMISX returned 15.02%/yr vs 9.17%/yr for MCEMX. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LMISX charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for MCEMX.

Performance

LMISX vs. MCEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin U.S. Large Cap Equity Fund (LMISX) and Martin Currie Emerging Markets Fund (MCEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMISX achieves a 10.96% return, which is significantly lower than MCEMX's 18.10% return. Over the past 10 years, LMISX has outperformed MCEMX with an annualized return of 15.02%, while MCEMX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.17% annualized return.

LMISX

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: 1.70%
• 6M: 9.30%
• YTD: 10.96%
• 1Y: 24.80%
• 3Y*: 22.64%
• 5Y*: 13.61%
• 10Y*: 15.02%

MCEMX

• 1D: -4.05%
• 1M: -5.84%
• 6M: 12.69%
• YTD: 18.10%
• 1Y: 42.77%
• 3Y*: 16.57%
• 5Y*: 3.36%
• 10Y*: 9.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMISX vs. MCEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LMISX Franklin U.S. Large Cap Equity Fund	10.96%	18.05%	29.58%	27.88%	-20.61%	31.69%	17.20%	25.95%	-7.57%	23.50%
MCEMX Martin Currie Emerging Markets Fund	18.10%	36.77%	2.89%	6.28%	-26.82%	-5.00%	27.81%	29.29%	-18.82%	47.10%

Correlation

The correlation between LMISX and MCEMX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.68

The correlation between LMISX and MCEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LMISX vs. MCEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMISX

LMISX Risk / Return Rank: 79
LMISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
LMISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
LMISX Omega Ratio Rank: 73
LMISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
LMISX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

MCEMX

MCEMX Risk / Return Rank: 65
MCEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
MCEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
MCEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 64
MCEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
MCEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMISX vs. MCEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Large Cap Equity Fund (LMISX) and Martin Currie Emerging Markets Fund (MCEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LMISX	MCEMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.01	1.68	+0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.78	2.14	+0.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.32	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.92	3.00	-0.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.07	10.52	+2.55

LMISX vs. MCEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMISX Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the MCEMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMISX and MCEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LMISX vs. MCEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMISX drawdown since its inception was -50.34%, which is greater than MCEMX's maximum drawdown of -46.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMISX and MCEMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LMISX	MCEMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.34%	-46.45%	-3.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.69%	-14.34%	+5.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.22%	-18.19%	-2.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.11%	-41.50%	+15.39%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.27%	-46.45%	+11.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.76%	-10.80%	+10.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.57%	-17.00%	+9.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.94%	4.08%	-2.14%

Volatility

LMISX vs. MCEMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin U.S. Large Cap Equity Fund (LMISX) is 4.06%, while Martin Currie Emerging Markets Fund (MCEMX) has a volatility of 13.20%. This indicates that LMISX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MCEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LMISX	MCEMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.06%	13.20%	-9.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.93%	23.62%	-13.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.63%	25.64%	-13.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.76%	20.87%	-3.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.76%	20.54%	-1.78%

LMISX vs. MCEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMISX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than MCEMX's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

LMISX vs. MCEMX - Dividend Comparison

LMISX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.31%, more than MCEMX's 0.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LMISX Franklin U.S. Large Cap Equity Fund	5.31%	4.11%	3.97%	7.68%	0.95%	25.55%	3.53%	8.42%	17.16%	6.53%	1.42%	6.23%
MCEMX Martin Currie Emerging Markets Fund	0.52%	0.68%	0.62%	1.41%	0.70%	0.23%	0.54%	2.54%	1.03%	0.17%	2.04%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LMISX and MCEMX in my portfolio?

LMISX and MCEMX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LMISX or MCEMX?

MCEMX has higher volatility (13.20%) compared to LMISX (4.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMISX dropped -50.34% vs MCEMX's -46.45%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LMISX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.