LMISX vs. FGJEX
LMISX (Franklin U.S. Large Cap Equity Fund) and FGJEX (Fidelity Advisor Growth & Income Fund Class Z) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past year, LMISX returned 29.31% vs 22.68% for FGJEX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LMISX charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for FGJEX.
Performance
LMISX vs. FGJEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LMISX achieves a 10.35% return, which is significantly higher than FGJEX's 6.93% return.
LMISX
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 4.47%
- YTD
- 10.35%
- 6M
- 10.89%
- 1Y
- 29.31%
- 3Y*
- 24.82%
- 5Y*
- 14.07%
- 10Y*
- 15.21%
FGJEX
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 1.07%
- YTD
- 6.93%
- 6M
- 8.33%
- 1Y
- 22.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LMISX vs. FGJEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LMISX Franklin U.S. Large Cap Equity Fund | 10.35% | 26.47% |
FGJEX Fidelity Advisor Growth & Income Fund Class Z | 6.93% | 24.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between LMISX and FGJEX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025 | 0.87 |
The correlation between LMISX and FGJEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LMISX vs. FGJEX — Risk / Return Rank
LMISX
FGJEX
LMISX vs. FGJEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Large Cap Equity Fund (LMISX) and Fidelity Advisor Growth & Income Fund Class Z (FGJEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LMISX | FGJEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.39 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.39 | 2.73 | +0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.85 | 11.46 | +4.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LMISX | FGJEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.47 | 2.14 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 2.73 | -2.16 |
Drawdowns
LMISX vs. FGJEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LMISX drawdown since its inception was -50.34%, which is greater than FGJEX's maximum drawdown of -8.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMISX and FGJEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LMISX | FGJEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.34% | -8.32% | -42.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.69% | -8.32% | -0.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.72% | -0.70% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.61% | -1.06% | -6.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.85% | 1.98% | -0.13% |
Volatility
LMISX vs. FGJEX - Volatility Comparison
Franklin U.S. Large Cap Equity Fund (LMISX) has a higher volatility of 2.81% compared to Fidelity Advisor Growth & Income Fund Class Z (FGJEX) at 2.34%. This indicates that LMISX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGJEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LMISX | FGJEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.81% | 2.34% | +0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.92% | 7.96% | +0.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.91% | 10.67% | +1.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.66% | 10.85% | +6.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.78% | 10.85% | +7.93% |
LMISX vs. FGJEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LMISX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than FGJEX's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
LMISX vs. FGJEX - Dividend Comparison
LMISX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, less than FGJEX's 9.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGJEX Fidelity Advisor Growth & Income Fund Class Z | 9.24% | 9.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LMISX Franklin U.S. Large Cap Equity Fund | 3.72% | 4.11% | 3.97% | 7.68% | 0.95% | 25.55% | 3.53% | 8.42% | 17.16% | 6.53% | 1.42% | 6.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LMISX and FGJEX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LMISX has higher volatility (2.81%) compared to FGJEX (2.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMISX dropped -50.34% vs FGJEX's -8.32%.
LMISX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LMISX and FGJEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer