PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LMGNX vs. AWYIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LMGNX vs. AWYIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ClearBridge International Growth Fund Class I (LMGNX) and CIBC Atlas Equity Income Fund (AWYIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMGNX achieves a 6.45% return, which is significantly higher than AWYIX's 2.05% return.


LMGNX

1D
0.65%
1M
5.33%
YTD
6.45%
6M
6.90%
1Y
13.69%
3Y*
13.42%
5Y*
5.04%
10Y*
10.15%

AWYIX

1D
0.17%
1M
1.77%
YTD
2.05%
6M
2.22%
1Y
10.13%
3Y*
12.78%
5Y*
7.78%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMGNX vs. AWYIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LMGNX
ClearBridge International Growth Fund Class I
6.45%23.05%7.48%14.30%-21.16%3.99%24.92%31.43%-10.75%
AWYIX
CIBC Atlas Equity Income Fund
2.05%7.66%18.19%16.39%-15.59%29.51%12.75%35.07%1.12%

Correlation

The correlation between LMGNX and AWYIX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2018

0.76

The correlation between LMGNX and AWYIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.76 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LMGNX vs. AWYIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMGNX
LMGNX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
LMGNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMGNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMGNX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
LMGNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMGNX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

AWYIX
AWYIX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
AWYIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AWYIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
AWYIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
AWYIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
AWYIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMGNX vs. AWYIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge International Growth Fund Class I (LMGNX) and CIBC Atlas Equity Income Fund (AWYIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LMGNXAWYIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.19

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.95

1.27

-0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.47

4.74

-1.28

LMGNX vs. AWYIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMGNX Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is lower than the AWYIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMGNX and AWYIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LMGNXAWYIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

1.07

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.54

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.68

-0.36

Drawdowns

LMGNX vs. AWYIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMGNX drawdown since its inception was -71.13%, which is greater than AWYIX's maximum drawdown of -35.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMGNX and AWYIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LMGNXAWYIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.13%

-35.79%

-35.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.62%

-8.35%

-5.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.43%

-18.72%

+4.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.96%

-19.82%

-15.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

-1.02%

+0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.47%

-5.02%

-10.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.74%

2.23%

+1.51%

Volatility

LMGNX vs. AWYIX - Volatility Comparison

ClearBridge International Growth Fund Class I (LMGNX) has a higher volatility of 6.35% compared to CIBC Atlas Equity Income Fund (AWYIX) at 2.32%. This indicates that LMGNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AWYIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LMGNXAWYIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.35%

2.32%

+4.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.84%

7.44%

+7.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.67%

9.88%

+7.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.72%

14.42%

+3.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.37%

17.88%

-0.51%

LMGNX vs. AWYIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMGNX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than AWYIX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

LMGNX vs. AWYIX - Dividend Comparison

LMGNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.88%, more than AWYIX's 2.14% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
AWYIX
CIBC Atlas Equity Income Fund
2.14%1.74%5.77%1.80%3.23%6.35%6.87%3.82%6.79%0.00%0.00%
LMGNX
ClearBridge International Growth Fund Class I
6.88%7.33%1.38%1.28%0.81%2.28%0.16%0.31%0.24%0.21%0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


LMGNX and AWYIX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LMGNX has higher volatility (6.35%) compared to AWYIX (2.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMGNX dropped -71.13% vs AWYIX's -35.79%.

AWYIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LMGNX and AWYIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer