PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LMGEX vs. TBGVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LMGEX vs. TBGVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin International Equity Fund (LMGEX) and Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund (TBGVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMGEX achieves a 6.84% return, which is significantly lower than TBGVX's 9.94% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LMGEX having a 7.84% annualized return and TBGVX not far ahead at 7.92%.


LMGEX

1D
-0.73%
1M
1.96%
YTD
6.84%
6M
9.01%
1Y
17.68%
3Y*
16.77%
5Y*
8.10%
10Y*
7.84%

TBGVX

1D
-0.06%
1M
4.06%
YTD
9.94%
6M
11.25%
1Y
17.93%
3Y*
13.54%
5Y*
8.11%
10Y*
7.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMGEX vs. TBGVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LMGEX
Franklin International Equity Fund
6.84%32.05%3.42%18.48%-13.55%12.87%2.74%17.61%-16.67%23.58%
TBGVX
Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund
9.94%23.86%2.47%12.48%-7.52%15.62%-1.00%14.64%-6.72%15.03%

Correlation

The correlation between LMGEX and TBGVX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 1995

0.75

The correlation between LMGEX and TBGVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.80 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LMGEX vs. TBGVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMGEX
LMGEX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
LMGEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMGEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMGEX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
LMGEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMGEX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

TBGVX
TBGVX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
TBGVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBGVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBGVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
TBGVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBGVX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMGEX vs. TBGVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Equity Fund (LMGEX) and Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund (TBGVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LMGEXTBGVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.37

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

2.00

-0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.52

6.43

-0.90

LMGEX vs. TBGVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMGEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the TBGVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMGEX and TBGVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LMGEXTBGVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

1.99

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.73

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.63

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.75

-0.48

Drawdowns

LMGEX vs. TBGVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMGEX drawdown since its inception was -63.37%, which is greater than TBGVX's maximum drawdown of -50.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMGEX and TBGVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LMGEXTBGVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.37%

-50.97%

-12.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.64%

-9.56%

-2.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.05%

-11.45%

-1.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.98%

-17.71%

-11.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.79%

-31.18%

-8.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.80%

-1.65%

-1.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.21%

-6.08%

-12.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.25%

2.96%

+0.29%

Volatility

LMGEX vs. TBGVX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin International Equity Fund (LMGEX) has a higher volatility of 4.58% compared to Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund (TBGVX) at 2.67%. This indicates that LMGEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TBGVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LMGEXTBGVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.58%

2.67%

+1.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.32%

7.78%

+4.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.16%

9.61%

+5.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.81%

11.11%

+4.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.18%

12.67%

+3.51%

LMGEX vs. TBGVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMGEX has a 2.05% expense ratio, which is higher than TBGVX's 1.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

LMGEX vs. TBGVX - Dividend Comparison

LMGEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.75%, less than TBGVX's 11.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LMGEX
Franklin International Equity Fund
7.75%8.28%5.68%1.51%2.88%5.10%0.58%0.49%1.62%1.60%1.30%0.91%
TBGVX
Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund
11.02%12.11%9.95%4.55%5.68%8.89%0.94%1.88%6.74%1.10%3.16%4.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


LMGEX and TBGVX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LMGEX has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to TBGVX (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMGEX dropped -63.37% vs TBGVX's -50.97%.

TBGVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LMGEX and TBGVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer