PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LMBS vs. VMBS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LMBS vs. VMBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Low Duration Mortgage Opportunities ETF (LMBS) and Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (VMBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMBS achieves a 1.24% return, which is significantly higher than VMBS's 0.66% return. Over the past 10 years, LMBS has outperformed VMBS with an annualized return of 2.67%, while VMBS has yielded a comparatively lower 1.35% annualized return.


LMBS

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.11%
YTD
1.24%
6M
1.47%
1Y
6.09%
3Y*
5.73%
5Y*
3.03%
10Y*
2.67%

VMBS

1D
-0.15%
1M
0.33%
YTD
0.66%
6M
0.85%
1Y
6.93%
3Y*
4.60%
5Y*
0.48%
10Y*
1.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMBS vs. VMBS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LMBS
First Trust Low Duration Mortgage Opportunities ETF
1.24%7.05%5.15%6.10%-3.07%-0.91%1.64%4.10%1.62%1.68%
VMBS
Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
0.66%8.36%1.70%5.34%-11.90%-1.28%3.76%6.19%0.91%2.47%

Correlation

The correlation between LMBS and VMBS is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2014

0.55

Over the past year, LMBS and VMBS have become more correlated (0.81) than their long-term average of 0.55, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LMBS vs. VMBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMBS
LMBS Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
LMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
LMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

VMBS
VMBS Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
VMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
VMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMBS vs. VMBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Low Duration Mortgage Opportunities ETF (LMBS) and Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (VMBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LMBSVMBSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.29

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.28

2.59

+1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.25

8.68

+9.56

LMBS vs. VMBS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMBS Sharpe Ratio is 3.10, which is higher than the VMBS Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMBS and VMBS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LMBSVMBSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.10

1.59

+1.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.19

0.07

+1.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.14

0.25

+0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.13

0.46

+0.67

Drawdowns

LMBS vs. VMBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMBS drawdown since its inception was -6.49%, smaller than the maximum VMBS drawdown of -17.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMBS and VMBS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LMBSVMBSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.49%

-17.47%

+10.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.43%

-2.68%

+1.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.72%

-7.65%

+5.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.12%

-17.12%

+11.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.49%

-17.47%

+10.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-1.33%

+0.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.80%

-2.49%

+1.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.33%

0.80%

-0.47%

Volatility

LMBS vs. VMBS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Low Duration Mortgage Opportunities ETF (LMBS) is 0.68%, while Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (VMBS) has a volatility of 1.62%. This indicates that LMBS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VMBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LMBSVMBSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.68%

1.62%

-0.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.45%

3.16%

-1.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.97%

4.37%

-2.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.56%

6.77%

-4.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.36%

5.40%

-3.04%

LMBS vs. VMBS - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMBS has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than VMBS's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

LMBS vs. VMBS - Dividend Comparison

LMBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, less than VMBS's 4.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LMBS
First Trust Low Duration Mortgage Opportunities ETF
4.10%4.08%4.28%3.96%2.22%2.04%2.27%2.55%2.76%2.73%2.84%3.03%
VMBS
Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
4.19%4.20%3.94%3.31%2.35%1.02%2.01%2.77%2.72%2.16%2.10%2.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


LMBS and VMBS have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VMBS has higher volatility (1.62%) compared to LMBS (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMBS dropped -6.49% vs VMBS's -17.47%.

On 10-year performance, LMBS leads with 2.67% vs 1.35% for VMBS. On fees, VMBS is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, LMBS has been the lower-risk option at 0.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, LMBS has performed better with a 2.67% return vs 1.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VMBS is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for LMBS.

VMBS has the higher dividend yield at 4.19%, compared with 4.10% for LMBS.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for LMBS and 0.04% for VMBS.

LMBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LMBS and VMBS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer