LMBO vs. FUTG
LMBO (Direxion Daily Crypto Industry Bull 2X Shares ETF) and FUTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. LMBO is passively managed, while FUTG is actively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LMBO charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FUTG.
Performance
LMBO vs. FUTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LMBO
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FUTG
- 1D
- -11.10%
- 1M
- -70.24%
- YTD
- -75.53%
- 6M
- -77.00%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LMBO vs. FUTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LMBO Direxion Daily Crypto Industry Bull 2X Shares ETF | -13.58% | -51.03% |
FUTG Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF | -75.53% | -0.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between LMBO and FUTG is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LMBO vs. FUTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Crypto Industry Bull 2X Shares ETF (LMBO) and Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF (FUTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LMBO | FUTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | -0.66 | — |
Drawdowns
LMBO vs. FUTG - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LMBO | FUTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -86.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -84.29% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -40.35% | — |
Volatility
LMBO vs. FUTG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LMBO | FUTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 136.01% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 136.01% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 136.01% | — |
LMBO vs. FUTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
LMBO has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than FUTG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
LMBO vs. FUTG - Dividend Comparison
LMBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.30%, while FUTG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
FUTG Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LMBO Direxion Daily Crypto Industry Bull 2X Shares ETF | 5.30% | 4.71% | 0.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LMBO and FUTG have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FUTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FUTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for LMBO.
LMBO has the higher dividend yield at 5.30%, compared with 0.00% for FUTG.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for LMBO and 0.75% for FUTG.
Find the right allocation for LMBO and FUTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer