LLYX vs. INTW
LLYX (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long LLY ETF) and INTW (GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, LLYX returned 58.74% vs 1617.48% for INTW. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LLYX charges 1.32%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for INTW.
Performance
LLYX vs. INTW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LLYX achieves a -9.81% return, which is significantly lower than INTW's 562.71% return.
LLYX
- 1D
- 3.19%
- 1M
- 23.54%
- YTD
- -9.81%
- 6M
- -3.59%
- 1Y
- 58.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INTW
- 1D
- 8.89%
- 1M
- 29.41%
- YTD
- 562.71%
- 6M
- 361.23%
- 1Y
- 1,617.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LLYX vs. INTW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LLYX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long LLY ETF | -9.81% | 16.71% |
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF | 562.71% | 50.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between LLYX and INTW is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LLYX vs. INTW — Risk / Return Rank
LLYX
INTW
LLYX vs. INTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long LLY ETF (LLYX) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LLYX | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.79 | 11.42 | -10.64 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.48 | 5.09 | -3.61 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.64 | -0.44 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | 33.18 | -31.93 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.68 | 77.63 | -74.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LLYX | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 | 11.42 | -10.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.00 | 3.39 | -3.39 |
Drawdowns
LLYX vs. INTW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LLYX drawdown since its inception was -67.98%, which is greater than INTW's maximum drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LLYX and INTW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LLYX | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.98% | -60.58% | -7.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.36% | -49.34% | +1.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.95% | -26.69% | +4.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.60% | -30.07% | -3.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.00% | 21.05% | +0.95% |
Volatility
LLYX vs. INTW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long LLY ETF (LLYX) is 18.20%, while GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW) has a volatility of 48.71%. This indicates that LLYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LLYX | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.20% | 48.71% | -30.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.69% | 111.40% | -58.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 74.98% | 143.36% | -68.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 76.29% | 145.22% | -68.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 76.29% | 145.22% | -68.93% |
LLYX vs. INTW - Expense Ratio Comparison
LLYX has a 1.32% expense ratio, which is lower than INTW's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
LLYX vs. INTW - Dividend Comparison
LLYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, while INTW has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LLYX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long LLY ETF | 3.06% | 2.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LLYX and INTW have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INTW has higher volatility (48.71%) compared to LLYX (18.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LLYX dropped -67.98% vs INTW's -60.58%.
On 1-year performance, INTW leads with 1617.48% vs 58.74% for LLYX. On fees, LLYX is cheaper at 1.32% per year. On volatility, LLYX has been the lower-risk option at 18.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, INTW has performed better with a 1617.48% return vs 58.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LLYX is cheaper with a 1.32% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for INTW.
LLYX has the higher dividend yield at 3.06%, compared with 0.00% for INTW.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.32% for LLYX and 1.50% for INTW.
INTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.42 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LLYX and INTW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer