PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LLY vs. DIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LLY vs. DIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) and Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LLY achieves a 5.78% return, which is significantly lower than DIV's 14.48% return. Over the past 10 years, LLY has outperformed DIV with an annualized return of 33.45%, while DIV has yielded a comparatively lower 4.30% annualized return.


LLY

1D
-2.41%
1M
12.74%
YTD
5.78%
6M
10.64%
1Y
39.26%
3Y*
37.45%
5Y*
39.59%
10Y*
33.45%

DIV

1D
0.68%
1M
0.97%
YTD
14.48%
6M
13.33%
1Y
16.51%
3Y*
11.89%
5Y*
5.31%
10Y*
4.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LLY vs. DIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
5.78%40.25%33.30%60.91%34.26%66.08%31.04%16.14%40.45%17.83%
DIV
Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF
14.48%3.10%11.27%-1.73%-3.92%30.60%-22.85%14.50%-6.60%9.90%

Correlation

The correlation between LLY and DIV is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2013

0.27

The correlation between LLY and DIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LLY vs. DIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LLY
LLY Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
LLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
LLY Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
LLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
LLY Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

DIV
DIV Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
DIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIV Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
DIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIV Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LLY vs. DIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) and Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LLYDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.26

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

3.02

-1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.28

8.43

-4.15

LLY vs. DIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LLY Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is lower than the DIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LLY and DIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LLY vs. DIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LLY drawdown since its inception was -68.24%, which is greater than DIV's maximum drawdown of -52.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LLY and DIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LLYDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.24%

-52.74%

-15.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.64%

-5.23%

-18.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.48%

-12.33%

-22.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.48%

-21.14%

-13.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.48%

-52.74%

+18.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.41%

-0.73%

-1.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.21%

-7.01%

-12.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.49%

1.88%

+7.61%

Volatility

LLY vs. DIV - Volatility Comparison

Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) has a higher volatility of 9.27% compared to Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) at 3.07%. This indicates that LLY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LLYDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.27%

3.07%

+6.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.16%

7.08%

+20.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.01%

10.32%

+27.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.46%

13.69%

+18.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.19%

17.98%

+12.21%

Dividends

LLY vs. DIV - Dividend Comparison

LLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than DIV's 6.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DIV
Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF
6.61%7.30%5.74%7.13%6.62%5.24%8.01%7.65%7.08%5.92%6.78%8.44%
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
0.57%0.56%0.67%0.78%1.07%1.23%1.75%1.96%1.94%2.46%2.77%2.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


LLY and DIV have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LLY has higher volatility (9.27%) compared to DIV (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LLY dropped -68.24% vs DIV's -52.74%.

DIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LLY and DIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer