LLLRX vs. AYBLX
LLLRX (Franklin Multi-Asset Growth Fund R) and AYBLX (Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, LLLRX returned 10.06%/yr vs 10.67%/yr for AYBLX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LLLRX charges 1.46%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for AYBLX.
Performance
LLLRX vs. AYBLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LLLRX achieves a 9.89% return, which is significantly lower than AYBLX's 13.99% return. Over the past 10 years, LLLRX has underperformed AYBLX with an annualized return of 10.06%, while AYBLX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.67% annualized return.
LLLRX
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- 9.89%
- 6M
- 9.07%
- 1Y
- 22.84%
- 3Y*
- 16.91%
- 5Y*
- 9.01%
- 10Y*
- 10.06%
AYBLX
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 1.64%
- YTD
- 13.99%
- 6M
- 13.54%
- 1Y
- 32.24%
- 3Y*
- 17.53%
- 5Y*
- 9.58%
- 10Y*
- 10.67%
LLLRX vs. AYBLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LLLRX Franklin Multi-Asset Growth Fund R | 9.89% | 16.07% | 16.26% | 16.76% | -14.31% | 16.64% | 8.20% | 21.08% | -9.52% | 15.46% |
AYBLX Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund | 13.99% | 19.80% | 9.64% | 15.41% | -14.39% | 15.48% | 12.92% | 22.22% | -4.43% | 15.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between LLLRX and AYBLX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2014 | 0.92 |
The correlation between LLLRX and AYBLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LLLRX vs. AYBLX — Risk / Return Rank
LLLRX
AYBLX
LLLRX vs. AYBLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Multi-Asset Growth Fund R (LLLRX) and Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund (AYBLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LLLRX | AYBLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.62 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.76 | 5.16 | -2.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.05 | 24.00 | -11.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LLLRX vs. AYBLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LLLRX drawdown since its inception was -32.05%, smaller than the maximum AYBLX drawdown of -36.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LLLRX and AYBLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LLLRX | AYBLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.05% | -36.28% | +4.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.69% | -6.41% | -2.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.80% | -13.39% | -3.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.63% | -20.26% | -5.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.05% | -24.24% | -7.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.97% | -0.52% | -0.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.51% | -3.78% | -1.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.99% | 1.38% | +0.61% |
Volatility
LLLRX vs. AYBLX - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Multi-Asset Growth Fund R (LLLRX) has a higher volatility of 4.89% compared to Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund (AYBLX) at 3.63%. This indicates that LLLRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AYBLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LLLRX | AYBLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.89% | 3.63% | +1.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.92% | 7.83% | +2.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.21% | 9.95% | +2.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.57% | 11.13% | +3.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.94% | 11.33% | +3.61% |
LLLRX vs. AYBLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LLLRX has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than AYBLX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
LLLRX vs. AYBLX - Dividend Comparison
LLLRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.60%, more than AYBLX's 3.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AYBLX Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund | 3.24% | 3.58% | 2.59% | 1.76% | 3.23% | 8.61% | 4.12% | 6.03% | 9.97% | 9.42% | 2.63% | 4.14% |
LLLRX Franklin Multi-Asset Growth Fund R | 11.60% | 11.15% | 6.02% | 5.28% | 8.64% | 7.09% | 4.77% | 5.64% | 5.76% | 11.27% | 4.31% | 11.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, LLLRX and AYBLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
LLLRX has higher volatility (4.89%) compared to AYBLX (3.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LLLRX dropped -32.05% vs AYBLX's -36.28%.
AYBLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.33 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LLLRX and AYBLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer