LLII vs. IPDP
LLII (REX LLY Growth & Income ETF) and IPDP (Dividend Performers ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. LLII charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for IPDP.
Performance
LLII vs. IPDP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LLII
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- 9.79%
- YTD
- -4.28%
- 6M
- 0.70%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IPDP
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LLII vs. IPDP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LLII REX LLY Growth & Income ETF | 0.05% |
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LLII vs. IPDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX LLY Growth & Income ETF (LLII) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LLII | IPDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | — | — |
Drawdowns
LLII vs. IPDP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LLII drawdown since its inception was -23.96%, which is greater than IPDP's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LLII and IPDP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LLII | IPDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.96% | 0.00% | -23.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.88% | 0.00% | -6.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.28% | 0.00% | -9.28% |
Volatility
LLII vs. IPDP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LLII | IPDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.42% | 0.00% | +36.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.42% | 0.00% | +36.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.42% | 0.00% | +36.42% |
LLII vs. IPDP - Expense Ratio Comparison
LLII has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than IPDP's 1.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
LLII vs. IPDP - Dividend Comparison
LLII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.95%, while IPDP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LLII REX LLY Growth & Income ETF | 25.95% | 5.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, LLII is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LLII is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for IPDP.
LLII has the higher dividend yield at 25.95%, compared with 0.00% for IPDP.
They also come from different issuers: REX and Innovative Portfolios. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for LLII and 1.52% for IPDP.
Find the right allocation for LLII and IPDP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer