LLDYX vs. FSRCX

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

LLDYX (Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund) and FSRCX (Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class C) are both Total Bond Market funds. Over the past 10 years, LLDYX returned 2.68%/yr vs 3.05%/yr for FSRCX. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LLDYX charges 0.38%/yr vs 1.72%/yr for FSRCX.

Performance

LLDYX vs. FSRCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LLDYX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class C (FSRCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LLDYX achieves a 0.93% return, which is significantly lower than FSRCX's 2.34% return. Over the past 10 years, LLDYX has underperformed FSRCX with an annualized return of 2.68%, while FSRCX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.05% annualized return.

LLDYX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.15%
• 6M: 0.93%
• YTD: 0.93%
• 1Y: 4.12%
• 3Y*: 5.29%
• 5Y*: 2.37%
• 10Y*: 2.68%

FSRCX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.19%
• 6M: 1.82%
• YTD: 2.34%
• 1Y: 6.58%
• 3Y*: 6.59%
• 5Y*: 1.78%
• 10Y*: 3.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LLDYX vs. FSRCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LLDYX Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund	0.93%	6.19%	5.13%	5.41%	-5.35%	1.07%	3.17%	5.64%	1.47%	2.74%
FSRCX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class C	2.34%	7.88%	4.38%	7.98%	-12.53%	2.56%	6.41%	9.95%	-3.81%	7.01%

Correlation

The correlation between LLDYX and FSRCX is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2004	0.47

The correlation between LLDYX and FSRCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LLDYX vs. FSRCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LLDYX

LLDYX Risk / Return Rank: 76
LLDYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
LLDYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
LLDYX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
LLDYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
LLDYX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

FSRCX

FSRCX Risk / Return Rank: 63
FSRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
FSRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
FSRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 65
FSRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
FSRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LLDYX vs. FSRCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LLDYX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class C (FSRCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LLDYX	FSRCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.62	1.72	-0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.84	2.50	+0.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	1.33	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.01	2.38	+0.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.59	9.94	+1.65

LLDYX vs. FSRCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LLDYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the FSRCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LLDYX and FSRCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LLDYX vs. FSRCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LLDYX drawdown since its inception was -10.54%, smaller than the maximum FSRCX drawdown of -18.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LLDYX and FSRCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LLDYX	FSRCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.54%	-18.16%	+7.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.29%	-2.66%	+1.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.29%	-4.24%	+2.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-7.43%	-16.69%	+9.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-9.67%	-16.69%	+7.02%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.26%	-0.66%	+0.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.20%	-2.08%	+0.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.34%	0.64%	-0.30%

Volatility

LLDYX vs. FSRCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LLDYX) is 0.61%, while Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class C (FSRCX) has a volatility of 1.33%. This indicates that LLDYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSRCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LLDYX	FSRCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.61%	1.33%	-0.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.71%	3.18%	-1.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.38%	3.69%	-1.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.76%	4.52%	-1.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.59%	4.40%	-1.81%

LLDYX vs. FSRCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LLDYX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than FSRCX's 1.72% expense ratio.

Dividends

LLDYX vs. FSRCX - Dividend Comparison

LLDYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.12%, more than FSRCX's 3.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSRCX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class C	3.30%	3.32%	2.59%	3.03%	2.08%	3.36%	3.59%	3.33%	2.50%	3.20%	2.69%	2.46%
LLDYX Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund	5.12%	5.21%	4.73%	4.71%	2.58%	2.52%	3.06%	3.79%	4.11%	3.90%	4.15%	4.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LLDYX and FSRCX in my portfolio?

LLDYX and FSRCX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LLDYX or FSRCX?

FSRCX has higher volatility (1.33%) compared to LLDYX (0.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LLDYX dropped -10.54% vs FSRCX's -18.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSRCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.