PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LKSCX vs. WMKSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LKSCX vs. WMKSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LKCM Small Cap Equity Fund (LKSCX) and WesMark Small Company Fund (WMKSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LKSCX achieves a 7.59% return, which is significantly lower than WMKSX's 15.68% return. Over the past 10 years, LKSCX has underperformed WMKSX with an annualized return of 11.78%, while WMKSX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.28% annualized return.


LKSCX

1D
0.60%
1M
2.08%
YTD
7.59%
6M
9.15%
1Y
23.99%
3Y*
16.90%
5Y*
6.23%
10Y*
11.78%

WMKSX

1D
0.60%
1M
2.80%
YTD
15.68%
6M
13.63%
1Y
31.01%
3Y*
23.77%
5Y*
10.53%
10Y*
13.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LKSCX vs. WMKSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LKSCX
LKCM Small Cap Equity Fund
7.59%13.22%15.35%22.57%-22.14%14.54%34.70%22.68%-5.67%17.08%
WMKSX
WesMark Small Company Fund
15.68%16.19%22.12%19.42%-20.72%22.81%36.78%20.32%-13.92%13.21%

Correlation

The correlation between LKSCX and WMKSX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 1994

0.84

The correlation between LKSCX and WMKSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LKSCX vs. WMKSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LKSCX
LKSCX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
LKSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LKSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
LKSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
LKSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
LKSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

WMKSX
WMKSX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
WMKSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMKSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMKSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
WMKSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMKSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LKSCX vs. WMKSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LKCM Small Cap Equity Fund (LKSCX) and WesMark Small Company Fund (WMKSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LKSCXWMKSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.32

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

3.96

-1.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.27

13.23

-3.96

LKSCX vs. WMKSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LKSCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the WMKSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LKSCX and WMKSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LKSCXWMKSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.53

1.90

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.41

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.56

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.37

+0.12

Drawdowns

LKSCX vs. WMKSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LKSCX drawdown since its inception was -59.07%, smaller than the maximum WMKSX drawdown of -64.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LKSCX and WMKSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LKSCXWMKSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.07%

-64.09%

+5.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.90%

-8.50%

-1.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.21%

-24.20%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.84%

-39.84%

+6.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.65%

-39.84%

-3.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.76%

-0.35%

-0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.39%

-15.68%

+6.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.74%

2.54%

+0.20%

Volatility

LKSCX vs. WMKSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LKCM Small Cap Equity Fund (LKSCX) is 3.37%, while WesMark Small Company Fund (WMKSX) has a volatility of 4.76%. This indicates that LKSCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WMKSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LKSCXWMKSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.37%

4.76%

-1.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.83%

12.05%

-0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.64%

17.71%

-1.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.47%

26.10%

-4.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.11%

23.97%

-0.86%

LKSCX vs. WMKSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LKSCX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is lower than WMKSX's 1.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

LKSCX vs. WMKSX - Dividend Comparison

LKSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.35%, less than WMKSX's 19.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LKSCX
LKCM Small Cap Equity Fund
8.35%8.98%7.27%2.77%2.43%15.70%3.86%5.24%20.61%19.58%15.37%14.66%
WMKSX
WesMark Small Company Fund
19.80%22.91%4.69%5.93%6.23%25.75%8.21%0.00%12.53%8.59%5.26%6.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


LKSCX and WMKSX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WMKSX has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to LKSCX (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LKSCX dropped -59.07% vs WMKSX's -64.09%.

WMKSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LKSCX and WMKSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer