PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LKSCX vs. JGMNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LKSCX vs. JGMNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LKCM Small Cap Equity Fund (LKSCX) and Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class N (JGMNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LKSCX achieves a 6.95% return, which is significantly lower than JGMNX's 13.93% return. Over the past 10 years, LKSCX has outperformed JGMNX with an annualized return of 11.41%, while JGMNX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.35% annualized return.


LKSCX

1D
0.43%
1M
-1.85%
6M
3.86%
YTD
6.95%
1Y
18.38%
3Y*
13.34%
5Y*
6.17%
10Y*
11.41%
ALL TIME*
10.21%

JGMNX

1D
-0.22%
1M
-2.66%
6M
9.75%
YTD
13.93%
1Y
23.32%
3Y*
12.05%
5Y*
4.27%
10Y*
10.35%
ALL TIME*
11.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LKSCX vs. JGMNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LKSCX
LKCM Small Cap Equity Fund
6.95%13.22%15.35%22.57%-22.14%14.54%34.70%22.68%-5.67%17.08%
JGMNX
Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class N
13.93%9.78%10.55%14.83%-23.56%6.88%28.75%28.60%-5.03%27.24%

Correlation

The correlation between LKSCX and JGMNX is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2012

0.93

The correlation between LKSCX and JGMNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LKSCX vs. JGMNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LKSCX
LKSCX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
LKSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LKSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
LKSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
LKSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
LKSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

JGMNX
JGMNX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
JGMNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JGMNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
JGMNX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
JGMNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
JGMNX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LKSCX vs. JGMNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LKCM Small Cap Equity Fund (LKSCX) and Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class N (JGMNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LKSCXJGMNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.22

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

1.96

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.01

7.97

-1.96

LKSCX vs. JGMNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LKSCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is comparable to the JGMNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LKSCX and JGMNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LKSCX vs. JGMNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LKSCX drawdown since its inception was -59.07%, which is greater than JGMNX's maximum drawdown of -39.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LKSCX and JGMNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LKSCXJGMNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.07%

-39.72%

-19.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.90%

-11.03%

+1.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.21%

-23.84%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.84%

-31.74%

-2.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.65%

-39.72%

-3.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.35%

-3.39%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.36%

-7.07%

-2.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

2.72%

+0.14%

Volatility

LKSCX vs. JGMNX - Volatility Comparison

LKCM Small Cap Equity Fund (LKSCX) has a higher volatility of 3.88% compared to Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class N (JGMNX) at 3.35%. This indicates that LKSCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JGMNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LKSCXJGMNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.88%

3.35%

+0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.09%

13.35%

-1.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.91%

16.80%

+0.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.36%

19.69%

+1.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.05%

20.55%

+2.50%

LKSCX vs. JGMNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LKSCX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than JGMNX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

LKSCX vs. JGMNX - Dividend Comparison

LKSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.40%, less than JGMNX's 9.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JGMNX
Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class N
9.53%10.86%7.35%6.96%6.10%19.99%4.06%4.20%7.41%5.03%2.96%7.71%
LKSCX
LKCM Small Cap Equity Fund
8.40%8.98%7.27%2.77%2.43%15.70%3.86%5.24%20.61%19.58%15.37%14.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


LKSCX and JGMNX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LKSCX has higher volatility (3.88%) compared to JGMNX (3.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LKSCX dropped -59.07% vs JGMNX's -39.72%.

JGMNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LKSCX and JGMNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer