LKSCX vs. CMCIX
LKSCX (LKCM Small Cap Equity Fund) and CMCIX (Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past year, LKSCX returned 23.99% vs -0.28% for CMCIX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LKSCX charges 1.03%/yr vs 1.26%/yr for CMCIX.
Performance
LKSCX vs. CMCIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LKSCX achieves a 7.59% return, which is significantly higher than CMCIX's 2.66% return.
LKSCX
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- 2.08%
- YTD
- 7.59%
- 6M
- 9.15%
- 1Y
- 23.99%
- 3Y*
- 16.90%
- 5Y*
- 6.23%
- 10Y*
- 11.78%
CMCIX
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- YTD
- 2.66%
- 6M
- 1.11%
- 1Y
- -0.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LKSCX vs. CMCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LKSCX LKCM Small Cap Equity Fund | 7.59% | 13.22% | 15.35% | 10.00% |
CMCIX Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I | 2.66% | -5.28% | 10.46% | 7.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between LKSCX and CMCIX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2023 | 0.86 |
The correlation between LKSCX and CMCIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LKSCX vs. CMCIX — Risk / Return Rank
LKSCX
CMCIX
LKSCX vs. CMCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LKCM Small Cap Equity Fund (LKSCX) and Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LKSCX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.02 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.57 | 0.09 | +2.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.27 | 0.20 | +9.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LKSCX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.53 | 0.07 | +1.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.34 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
LKSCX vs. CMCIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LKSCX drawdown since its inception was -59.07%, which is greater than CMCIX's maximum drawdown of -21.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LKSCX and CMCIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LKSCX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.07% | -21.50% | -37.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.90% | -11.68% | +1.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.76% | -9.96% | +9.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.39% | -6.45% | -2.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.74% | 4.99% | -2.25% |
Volatility
LKSCX vs. CMCIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for LKCM Small Cap Equity Fund (LKSCX) is 3.37%, while Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX) has a volatility of 3.90%. This indicates that LKSCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LKSCX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.37% | 3.90% | -0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.83% | 10.59% | +1.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.64% | 15.15% | +1.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.47% | 16.54% | +4.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.11% | 16.54% | +6.57% |
LKSCX vs. CMCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LKSCX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is lower than CMCIX's 1.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
LKSCX vs. CMCIX - Dividend Comparison
LKSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.35%, more than CMCIX's 4.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMCIX Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I | 4.14% | 4.25% | 7.13% | 0.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LKSCX LKCM Small Cap Equity Fund | 8.35% | 8.98% | 7.27% | 2.77% | 2.43% | 15.70% | 3.86% | 5.24% | 20.61% | 19.58% | 15.37% | 14.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LKSCX and CMCIX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CMCIX has higher volatility (3.90%) compared to LKSCX (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LKSCX dropped -59.07% vs CMCIX's -21.50%.
LKSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LKSCX and CMCIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer