PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LKINX vs. RWIIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LKINX vs. RWIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LKCM International Equity Fund (LKINX) and Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund (RWIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LKINX achieves a 10.46% return, which is significantly higher than RWIIX's 8.40% return.


LKINX

1D
0.46%
1M
-0.29%
6M
6.15%
YTD
10.46%
1Y
18.61%
3Y*
12.74%
5Y*
5.45%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.67%

RWIIX

1D
0.43%
1M
2.25%
6M
3.15%
YTD
8.40%
1Y
18.29%
3Y*
3.96%
5Y*
1.95%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LKINX vs. RWIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
LKINX
LKCM International Equity Fund
10.46%21.87%4.83%16.10%-20.54%18.00%14.45%10.97%
RWIIX
Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund
8.40%7.87%-6.03%9.07%-11.57%10.68%14.57%1.51%

Correlation

The correlation between LKINX and RWIIX is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2019

0.62

The correlation between LKINX and RWIIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (5 years) to 0.72 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LKINX vs. RWIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LKINX
LKINX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
LKINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LKINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
LKINX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
LKINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
LKINX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

RWIIX
RWIIX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
RWIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
RWIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LKINX vs. RWIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LKCM International Equity Fund (LKINX) and Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund (RWIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LKINXRWIIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.31

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

2.77

-0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.51

6.71

+0.81

LKINX vs. RWIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LKINX Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the RWIIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LKINX and RWIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LKINX vs. RWIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LKINX drawdown since its inception was -35.00%, which is greater than RWIIX's maximum drawdown of -20.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LKINX and RWIIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LKINXRWIIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.00%

-20.34%

-14.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.54%

-6.94%

-2.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.41%

-20.34%

+6.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.95%

-20.34%

-13.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.91%

-1.54%

+0.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.33%

-7.72%

+0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

2.86%

-0.26%

Volatility

LKINX vs. RWIIX - Volatility Comparison

LKCM International Equity Fund (LKINX) has a higher volatility of 3.09% compared to Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund (RWIIX) at 2.85%. This indicates that LKINX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RWIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LKINXRWIIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.09%

2.85%

+0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.18%

9.36%

+1.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.64%

11.61%

+2.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.32%

11.70%

+5.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.39%

10.98%

+8.41%

LKINX vs. RWIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LKINX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than RWIIX's 1.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

LKINX vs. RWIIX - Dividend Comparison

LKINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, less than RWIIX's 8.06% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
LKINX
LKCM International Equity Fund
1.19%1.32%1.40%1.45%4.00%1.24%0.19%0.06%0.00%0.00%
RWIIX
Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund
8.06%8.74%0.00%6.82%1.72%14.15%6.51%1.84%0.86%0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


LKINX and RWIIX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LKINX has higher volatility (3.09%) compared to RWIIX (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LKINX dropped -35.00% vs RWIIX's -20.34%.

RWIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LKINX and RWIIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer