PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LKFIX vs. LKSMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LKFIX vs. LKSMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LKCM Fixed Income Fund (LKFIX) and LKCM Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund (LKSMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, LKFIX has underperformed LKSMX with an annualized return of 2.01%, while LKSMX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.75% annualized return.


LKFIX

1D
-0.28%
1M
0.29%
YTD
-0.00%
6M
0.27%
1Y
3.26%
3Y*
4.44%
5Y*
1.59%
10Y*
2.01%

LKSMX

1D
0.50%
1M
2.10%
YTD
7.05%
6M
4.82%
1Y
12.59%
3Y*
14.56%
5Y*
5.49%
10Y*
11.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LKFIX vs. LKSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LKFIX
LKCM Fixed Income Fund
-0.00%6.66%3.06%4.98%-5.63%-1.54%4.29%6.71%0.26%2.15%
LKSMX
LKCM Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund
7.05%5.27%15.64%25.76%-22.23%15.44%30.55%31.02%-8.91%24.18%

Correlation

The correlation between LKFIX and LKSMX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2011

-0.01

The correlation between LKFIX and LKSMX shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (all time) to 0.37 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LKFIX vs. LKSMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LKFIX
LKFIX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
LKFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LKFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
LKFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
LKFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
LKFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

LKSMX
LKSMX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
LKSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LKSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
LKSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
LKSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
LKSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LKFIX vs. LKSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LKCM Fixed Income Fund (LKFIX) and LKCM Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund (LKSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LKFIXLKSMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.15

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

1.08

+0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.93

3.45

+2.48

LKFIX vs. LKSMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LKFIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is higher than the LKSMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LKFIX and LKSMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LKFIX vs. LKSMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LKFIX drawdown since its inception was -8.97%, smaller than the maximum LKSMX drawdown of -39.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LKFIX and LKSMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LKFIXLKSMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.97%

-39.56%

+30.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.76%

-13.08%

+11.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.19%

-21.23%

+19.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.60%

-27.51%

+18.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.97%

-39.56%

+30.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.02%

-0.65%

-0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.12%

-7.71%

+6.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.58%

4.09%

-3.51%

Volatility

LKFIX vs. LKSMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LKCM Fixed Income Fund (LKFIX) is 0.79%, while LKCM Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund (LKSMX) has a volatility of 5.12%. This indicates that LKFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LKSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LKFIXLKSMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.79%

5.12%

-4.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.94%

13.41%

-11.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.54%

17.34%

-14.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.99%

19.87%

-16.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.64%

21.40%

-18.76%

LKFIX vs. LKSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LKFIX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than LKSMX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

LKFIX vs. LKSMX - Dividend Comparison

LKFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, less than LKSMX's 5.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LKFIX
LKCM Fixed Income Fund
3.70%3.57%3.03%2.28%1.57%1.36%1.74%2.27%2.26%2.04%2.18%2.78%
LKSMX
LKCM Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund
5.96%6.38%0.00%0.00%8.27%17.23%6.48%14.23%21.66%12.01%18.07%7.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


LKFIX and LKSMX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LKSMX has higher volatility (5.12%) compared to LKFIX (0.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LKFIX dropped -8.97% vs LKSMX's -39.56%.

LKFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LKFIX and LKSMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer