PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LKFIX vs. CPUIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LKFIX vs. CPUIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LKCM Fixed Income Fund (LKFIX) and AAM/Insight Select Income Fund (CPUIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, LKFIX has underperformed CPUIX with an annualized return of 2.01%, while CPUIX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.72% annualized return.


LKFIX

1D
-0.28%
1M
0.29%
YTD
-0.00%
6M
0.27%
1Y
3.26%
3Y*
4.44%
5Y*
1.59%
10Y*
2.01%

CPUIX

1D
-0.33%
1M
0.83%
YTD
0.43%
6M
0.65%
1Y
4.85%
3Y*
4.90%
5Y*
0.11%
10Y*
2.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LKFIX vs. CPUIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LKFIX
LKCM Fixed Income Fund
-0.00%6.66%3.06%4.98%-5.63%-1.54%4.29%6.71%0.26%2.15%
CPUIX
AAM/Insight Select Income Fund
0.43%6.59%2.61%8.40%-16.27%-0.12%10.20%14.81%-3.01%6.86%

Correlation

The correlation between LKFIX and CPUIX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014

0.81

The correlation between LKFIX and CPUIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LKFIX vs. CPUIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LKFIX
LKFIX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
LKFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LKFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
LKFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
LKFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
LKFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

CPUIX
CPUIX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
CPUIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPUIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPUIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
CPUIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPUIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LKFIX vs. CPUIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LKCM Fixed Income Fund (LKFIX) and AAM/Insight Select Income Fund (CPUIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LKFIXCPUIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.22

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

1.62

+0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.93

5.03

+0.89

LKFIX vs. CPUIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LKFIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the CPUIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LKFIX and CPUIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LKFIX vs. CPUIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LKFIX drawdown since its inception was -8.97%, smaller than the maximum CPUIX drawdown of -22.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LKFIX and CPUIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LKFIXCPUIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.97%

-22.37%

+13.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.76%

-3.22%

+1.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.19%

-6.03%

+3.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.60%

-22.37%

+13.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.97%

-22.37%

+13.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.02%

-1.78%

+0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.12%

-4.45%

+3.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.58%

1.03%

-0.45%

Volatility

LKFIX vs. CPUIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LKCM Fixed Income Fund (LKFIX) is 0.79%, while AAM/Insight Select Income Fund (CPUIX) has a volatility of 1.07%. This indicates that LKFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CPUIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LKFIXCPUIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.79%

1.07%

-0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.94%

3.09%

-1.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.54%

4.13%

-1.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.99%

5.99%

-3.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.64%

5.53%

-2.89%

LKFIX vs. CPUIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LKFIX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than CPUIX's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

LKFIX vs. CPUIX - Dividend Comparison

LKFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, less than CPUIX's 4.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CPUIX
AAM/Insight Select Income Fund
4.79%3.53%3.81%3.61%3.98%3.15%3.83%3.19%3.80%3.12%3.21%3.29%
LKFIX
LKCM Fixed Income Fund
3.70%3.57%3.03%2.28%1.57%1.36%1.74%2.27%2.26%2.04%2.18%2.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


LKFIX and CPUIX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CPUIX has higher volatility (1.07%) compared to LKFIX (0.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LKFIX dropped -8.97% vs CPUIX's -22.37%.

LKFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LKFIX and CPUIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer