PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LKEQX vs. AMRGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LKEQX vs. AMRGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LKCM Equity Fund (LKEQX) and American Growth Fund Series One (AMRGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LKEQX achieves a 6.14% return, which is significantly lower than AMRGX's 18.37% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LKEQX having a 11.92% annualized return and AMRGX not far ahead at 12.23%.


LKEQX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.71%
YTD
6.14%
6M
5.52%
1Y
17.87%
3Y*
13.13%
5Y*
7.10%
10Y*
11.92%

AMRGX

1D
1.75%
1M
7.84%
YTD
18.37%
6M
16.83%
1Y
37.84%
3Y*
19.51%
5Y*
10.60%
10Y*
12.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LKEQX vs. AMRGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LKEQX
LKCM Equity Fund
6.14%10.39%14.37%12.65%-15.50%22.50%22.79%29.85%-3.30%21.69%
AMRGX
American Growth Fund Series One
18.37%11.18%16.61%24.38%-19.93%15.64%18.65%36.73%-9.07%13.37%

Correlation

The correlation between LKEQX and AMRGX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 1996

0.84

The correlation between LKEQX and AMRGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.87 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LKEQX vs. AMRGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LKEQX
LKEQX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
LKEQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LKEQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
LKEQX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
LKEQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
LKEQX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

AMRGX
AMRGX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
AMRGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMRGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMRGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
AMRGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMRGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LKEQX vs. AMRGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LKCM Equity Fund (LKEQX) and American Growth Fund Series One (AMRGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LKEQXAMRGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.59

1.47

+0.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.28

2.23

+0.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.39

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

2.83

-0.71

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.16

6.90

+1.27

LKEQX vs. AMRGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LKEQX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the AMRGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LKEQX and AMRGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LKEQXAMRGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59

1.47

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.48

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.57

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.12

+0.40

Drawdowns

LKEQX vs. AMRGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LKEQX drawdown since its inception was -48.52%, smaller than the maximum AMRGX drawdown of -80.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LKEQX and AMRGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LKEQXAMRGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.52%

-80.32%

+31.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.94%

-13.98%

+5.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.59%

-21.15%

+0.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.63%

-35.42%

+12.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.15%

-35.42%

+5.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.04%

0.00%

-1.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.79%

-40.25%

+33.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

5.66%

-3.34%

Volatility

LKEQX vs. AMRGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LKCM Equity Fund (LKEQX) is 2.92%, while American Growth Fund Series One (AMRGX) has a volatility of 6.47%. This indicates that LKEQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMRGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LKEQXAMRGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.92%

6.47%

-3.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.08%

24.98%

-15.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.91%

26.89%

-14.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.52%

22.21%

-6.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.75%

21.50%

-4.75%

LKEQX vs. AMRGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LKEQX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than AMRGX's 4.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

LKEQX vs. AMRGX - Dividend Comparison

LKEQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.81%, less than AMRGX's 15.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMRGX
American Growth Fund Series One
15.06%17.82%12.39%8.17%7.77%12.21%2.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LKEQX
LKCM Equity Fund
7.81%8.28%6.82%1.46%5.50%6.83%5.60%4.44%7.75%4.87%6.61%2.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


LKEQX and AMRGX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMRGX has higher volatility (6.47%) compared to LKEQX (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LKEQX dropped -48.52% vs AMRGX's -80.32%.

LKEQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LKEQX and AMRGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer