LIWPX vs. WFSPX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LIWPX (BlackRock LifePath Index 2065 Fund) and WFSPX (iShares S&P 500 Index Fund) are both mutual funds - LIWPX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by BlackRock, while WFSPX is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 5 years, LIWPX returned 10.44%/yr vs 14.24%/yr for WFSPX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. LIWPX charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for WFSPX.

Performance

LIWPX vs. WFSPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock LifePath Index 2065 Fund (LIWPX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIWPX achieves a 13.09% return, which is significantly higher than WFSPX's 11.69% return.

LIWPX

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: 5.68%
• YTD: 13.09%
• 6M: 13.96%
• 1Y: 29.84%
• 3Y*: 20.01%
• 5Y*: 10.44%
• 10Y*: —

WFSPX

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 5.80%
• YTD: 11.69%
• 6M: 11.72%
• 1Y: 28.93%
• 3Y*: 22.71%
• 5Y*: 14.24%
• 10Y*: 15.54%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LIWPX vs. WFSPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
LIWPX BlackRock LifePath Index 2065 Fund	13.09%	21.32%	14.17%	21.22%	-18.52%	18.51%	15.12%	5.67%
WFSPX iShares S&P 500 Index Fund	11.69%	17.83%	24.94%	26.25%	-18.14%	28.63%	18.43%	6.43%

Correlation

The correlation between LIWPX and WFSPX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2019	0.96

The correlation between LIWPX and WFSPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LIWPX vs. WFSPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIWPX

LIWPX Risk / Return Rank: 67
LIWPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
LIWPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
LIWPX Omega Ratio Rank: 60
LIWPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
LIWPX Martin Ratio Rank: 74

WFSPX

WFSPX Risk / Return Rank: 73
WFSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
WFSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
WFSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
WFSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
WFSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIWPX vs. WFSPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock LifePath Index 2065 Fund (LIWPX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LIWPX	WFSPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.40	2.52	-0.12
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.33	3.42	-0.09
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.46	-0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.17	3.35	-0.18
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.08	15.65	-1.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LIWPX vs. WFSPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIWPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the WFSPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIWPX and WFSPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LIWPX	WFSPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.40	2.52	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	0.85	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.87	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.70	0.13	+0.57

Drawdowns

LIWPX vs. WFSPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIWPX drawdown since its inception was -33.12%, smaller than the maximum WFSPX drawdown of -58.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIWPX and WFSPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LIWPX	WFSPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.12%	-58.21%	+25.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.57%	-8.90%	-0.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.97%	-18.74%	+1.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.57%	-24.51%	-2.06%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.74%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.88%	-12.77%	+6.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.15%	1.90%	+0.25%

Volatility

LIWPX vs. WFSPX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock LifePath Index 2065 Fund (LIWPX) has a higher volatility of 3.88% compared to iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX) at 2.82%. This indicates that LIWPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WFSPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LIWPX	WFSPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.88%	2.82%	+1.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.13%	8.97%	+1.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.63%	11.85%	+0.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.84%	16.88%	-1.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.56%	18.02%	+0.54%

LIWPX vs. WFSPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LIWPX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than WFSPX's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

LIWPX vs. WFSPX - Dividend Comparison

LIWPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than WFSPX's 1.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LIWPX BlackRock LifePath Index 2065 Fund	1.38%	1.57%	0.00%	1.76%	1.50%	1.58%	1.13%	0.83%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WFSPX iShares S&P 500 Index Fund	1.56%	1.72%	1.41%	1.50%	2.02%	1.82%	1.66%	1.99%	2.00%	1.62%	2.37%	2.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LIWPX and WFSPX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, LIWPX and WFSPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, LIWPX or WFSPX?

LIWPX has higher volatility (3.88%) compared to WFSPX (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIWPX dropped -33.12% vs WFSPX's -58.21%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WFSPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.