LIWPX vs. GLDM
LIWPX (BlackRock LifePath Index 2065 Fund) and GLDM (SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust) are both funds - LIWPX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by BlackRock, while GLDM is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Over the past 5 years, LIWPX returned 9.48%/yr vs 17.89%/yr for GLDM. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LIWPX charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GLDM.
Performance
LIWPX vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LIWPX achieves a 9.12% return, which is significantly higher than GLDM's 0.30% return.
LIWPX
- 1D
- -3.04%
- 1M
- -1.10%
- YTD
- 9.12%
- 6M
- 9.89%
- 1Y
- 24.26%
- 3Y*
- 18.49%
- 5Y*
- 9.48%
- 10Y*
- —
GLDM
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -8.41%
- YTD
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 3.19%
- 1Y
- 30.55%
- 3Y*
- 30.08%
- 5Y*
- 17.89%
- 10Y*
- —
LIWPX vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LIWPX BlackRock LifePath Index 2065 Fund | 9.12% | 21.32% | 14.17% | 21.22% | -18.52% | 18.51% | 15.12% | 5.67% |
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | 0.30% | 64.20% | 27.08% | 13.04% | -0.47% | -4.01% | 25.10% | 1.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between LIWPX and GLDM is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2019 | 0.19 |
The correlation between LIWPX and GLDM shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (all time) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LIWPX vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank
LIWPX
GLDM
LIWPX vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock LifePath Index 2065 Fund (LIWPX) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LIWPX | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.23 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.65 | 1.53 | +1.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.69 | 3.85 | +7.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LIWPX | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.94 | 1.15 | +0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 1.00 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.99 | -0.32 |
Drawdowns
LIWPX vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LIWPX drawdown since its inception was -33.12%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIWPX and GLDM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LIWPX | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.12% | -21.63% | -11.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.57% | -20.00% | +10.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.97% | -20.00% | +3.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.57% | -20.92% | -5.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.52% | -19.80% | +16.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.87% | -6.24% | +0.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.16% | 7.96% | -5.80% |
Volatility
LIWPX vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BlackRock LifePath Index 2065 Fund (LIWPX) is 4.68%, while SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) has a volatility of 5.65%. This indicates that LIWPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LIWPX | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.68% | 5.65% | -0.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.65% | 23.31% | -12.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.05% | 26.65% | -13.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.90% | 17.98% | -2.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.59% | 16.89% | +1.70% |
LIWPX vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
LIWPX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
LIWPX vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison
LIWPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LIWPX BlackRock LifePath Index 2065 Fund | 1.44% | 1.57% | 0.00% | 1.76% | 1.50% | 1.58% | 1.13% | 0.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LIWPX and GLDM have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLDM has higher volatility (5.65%) compared to LIWPX (4.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIWPX dropped -33.12% vs GLDM's -21.63%.
LIWPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LIWPX and GLDM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer