LITL vs. MAXI
LITL (Simplify Piper Sandler US Small-Cap PLUS Income ETF) and MAXI (Simplify Bitcoin Strategy PLUS Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LITL is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Simplify, while MAXI is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Simplify. Over the past year, LITL returned 27.83% vs -63.13% for MAXI. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LITL charges 0.91%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for MAXI.
Performance
LITL vs. MAXI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LITL achieves a 16.34% return, which is significantly higher than MAXI's -31.59% return.
LITL
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- 3.67%
- 6M
- 12.34%
- YTD
- 16.34%
- 1Y
- 27.83%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 30.38%
MAXI
- 1D
- 2.51%
- 1M
- 6.66%
- 6M
- -39.33%
- YTD
- -31.59%
- 1Y
- -63.13%
- 3Y*
- 8.87%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 19.90%
LITL vs. MAXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LITL Simplify Piper Sandler US Small-Cap PLUS Income ETF | 16.34% | 18.93% |
MAXI Simplify Bitcoin Strategy PLUS Income ETF | -31.59% | -28.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between LITL and MAXI is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LITL vs. MAXI — Risk / Return Rank
LITL
MAXI
LITL vs. MAXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Piper Sandler US Small-Cap PLUS Income ETF (LITL) and Simplify Bitcoin Strategy PLUS Income ETF (MAXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LITL | MAXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 0.82 | +0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | -0.91 | +3.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.22 | -1.30 | +10.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LITL vs. MAXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LITL drawdown since its inception was -9.32%, smaller than the maximum MAXI drawdown of -69.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LITL and MAXI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LITL | MAXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.32% | -69.56% | +60.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.32% | -69.56% | +60.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -69.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.87% | -65.32% | +63.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.23% | -20.31% | +18.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.03% | 48.75% | -45.72% |
Volatility
LITL vs. MAXI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Simplify Piper Sandler US Small-Cap PLUS Income ETF (LITL) is 3.45%, while Simplify Bitcoin Strategy PLUS Income ETF (MAXI) has a volatility of 14.74%. This indicates that LITL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MAXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LITL | MAXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.45% | 14.74% | -11.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.37% | 44.51% | -32.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.18% | 64.55% | -46.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.42% | 63.40% | -44.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.42% | 63.40% | -44.98% |
LITL vs. MAXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
LITL has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than MAXI's 1.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
LITL vs. MAXI - Dividend Comparison
LITL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, less than MAXI's 62.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LITL Simplify Piper Sandler US Small-Cap PLUS Income ETF | 1.50% | 0.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MAXI Simplify Bitcoin Strategy PLUS Income ETF | 62.27% | 49.00% | 32.06% | 29.63% | 4.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LITL and MAXI have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MAXI has higher volatility (14.74%) compared to LITL (3.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LITL dropped -9.32% vs MAXI's -69.56%.
On 1-year performance, LITL leads with 27.83% vs -63.13% for MAXI. On fees, LITL is cheaper at 0.91% per year. On volatility, LITL has been the lower-risk option at 3.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, LITL has performed better with a 27.83% return vs -63.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LITL is cheaper with a 0.91% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for MAXI.
MAXI has the higher dividend yield at 62.27%, compared with 1.50% for LITL.
LITL is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while MAXI is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.91% for LITL and 1.31% for MAXI.
LITL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LITL and MAXI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer