LITL vs. HIGH
LITL (Simplify Piper Sandler US Small-Cap PLUS Income ETF) and HIGH (Simplify Enhanced Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LITL is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Simplify, while HIGH is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Simplify. Over the past year, LITL returned 27.83% vs -3.11% for HIGH. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LITL charges 0.91%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HIGH.
Performance
LITL vs. HIGH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LITL achieves a 16.34% return, which is significantly higher than HIGH's -0.88% return.
LITL
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- 3.67%
- 6M
- 12.34%
- YTD
- 16.34%
- 1Y
- 27.83%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 30.38%
HIGH
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.60%
- 6M
- -0.66%
- YTD
- -0.88%
- 1Y
- -3.11%
- 3Y*
- 2.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.49%
LITL vs. HIGH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LITL Simplify Piper Sandler US Small-Cap PLUS Income ETF | 16.34% | 18.93% |
HIGH Simplify Enhanced Income ETF | -0.88% | -0.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between LITL and HIGH is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025 | 0.61 |
The correlation between LITL and HIGH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LITL vs. HIGH — Risk / Return Rank
LITL
HIGH
LITL vs. HIGH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Piper Sandler US Small-Cap PLUS Income ETF (LITL) and Simplify Enhanced Income ETF (HIGH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LITL | HIGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 0.93 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | -0.44 | +3.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.22 | -0.71 | +9.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LITL vs. HIGH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LITL drawdown since its inception was -9.32%, roughly equal to the maximum HIGH drawdown of -9.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LITL and HIGH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LITL | HIGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.32% | -9.50% | +0.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.32% | -7.08% | -2.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.87% | -7.59% | +5.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.23% | -2.53% | +0.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.03% | 4.37% | -1.34% |
Volatility
LITL vs. HIGH - Volatility Comparison
Simplify Piper Sandler US Small-Cap PLUS Income ETF (LITL) has a higher volatility of 3.45% compared to Simplify Enhanced Income ETF (HIGH) at 1.80%. This indicates that LITL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HIGH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LITL | HIGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.45% | 1.80% | +1.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.37% | 3.77% | +8.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.18% | 7.21% | +10.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.42% | 9.47% | +8.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.42% | 9.47% | +8.95% |
LITL vs. HIGH - Expense Ratio Comparison
LITL has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than HIGH's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
LITL vs. HIGH - Dividend Comparison
LITL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, less than HIGH's 7.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIGH Simplify Enhanced Income ETF | 7.12% | 7.71% | 8.34% | 9.40% | 0.62% |
LITL Simplify Piper Sandler US Small-Cap PLUS Income ETF | 1.50% | 0.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LITL and HIGH have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LITL has higher volatility (3.45%) compared to HIGH (1.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LITL dropped -9.32% vs HIGH's -9.50%.
On 1-year performance, LITL leads with 27.83% vs -3.11% for HIGH. On fees, HIGH is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, HIGH has been the lower-risk option at 1.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, LITL has performed better with a 27.83% return vs -3.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HIGH is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.91% for LITL.
HIGH has the higher dividend yield at 7.12%, compared with 1.50% for LITL.
LITL is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while HIGH is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.91% for LITL and 0.50% for HIGH.
LITL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LITL and HIGH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer