PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LITE vs. NEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LITE vs. NEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lumentum Holdings Inc. (LITE) and Newmont Corporation (NEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LITE achieves a 150.02% return, which is significantly higher than NEM's 0.82% return. Over the past 10 years, LITE has outperformed NEM with an annualized return of 43.74%, while NEM has yielded a comparatively lower 13.80% annualized return.


LITE

1D
3.59%
1M
-5.06%
YTD
150.02%
6M
184.13%
1Y
1,017.52%
3Y*
158.28%
5Y*
62.72%
10Y*
43.74%

NEM

1D
2.71%
1M
-7.88%
YTD
0.82%
6M
2.58%
1Y
74.95%
3Y*
36.14%
5Y*
10.51%
10Y*
13.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LITE vs. NEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LITE
Lumentum Holdings Inc.
150.02%339.06%60.15%0.48%-50.68%11.57%19.55%88.76%-14.09%26.52%
NEM
Newmont Corporation
0.82%172.82%-7.83%-8.76%-20.77%7.40%40.28%30.52%-6.15%10.91%

Correlation

The correlation between LITE and NEM is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2015

0.11

The correlation between LITE and NEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

LITE:

$5.26

NEM:

$6.34

PE Ratio

LITE:

175.08

NEM:

15.82

PS Ratio

LITE:

30.95

NEM:

4.83

Total Revenue (TTM)

LITE:

$2.49B

NEM:

$17.23B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LITE:

$938.50M

NEM:

$8.97B

EBITDA (TTM)

LITE:

$470.10M

NEM:

$13.78B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LITE vs. NEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LITE
LITE Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
LITE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LITE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
LITE Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
LITE Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
LITE Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

NEM
NEM Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
NEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
NEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LITE vs. NEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lumentum Holdings Inc. (LITE) and Newmont Corporation (NEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LITENEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+9.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.71

1.29

+0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

34.43

2.78

+31.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

126.26

7.58

+118.68

LITE vs. NEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LITE Sharpe Ratio is 11.43, which is higher than the NEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LITE and NEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LITE vs. NEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LITE drawdown since its inception was -66.89%, smaller than the maximum NEM drawdown of -81.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LITE and NEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LITENEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.89%

-81.30%

+14.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.70%

-29.39%

+0.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.63%

-36.57%

-14.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.48%

-62.40%

-4.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.89%

-62.40%

-4.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.49%

-23.71%

+11.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.57%

-41.37%

+17.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.81%

10.73%

-2.92%

Volatility

LITE vs. NEM - Volatility Comparison

Lumentum Holdings Inc. (LITE) has a higher volatility of 28.12% compared to Newmont Corporation (NEM) at 15.74%. This indicates that LITE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LITENEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.12%

15.74%

+12.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

69.73%

37.43%

+32.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

86.47%

47.44%

+39.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.94%

37.99%

+21.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.62%

35.67%

+20.95%

Dividends

LITE vs. NEM - Dividend Comparison

LITE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LITE
Lumentum Holdings Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NEM
Newmont Corporation
1.02%1.00%2.69%3.87%4.66%3.55%1.74%3.31%1.62%0.67%0.37%0.56%

Financials

LITE vs. NEM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lumentum Holdings Inc. and Newmont Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B20222023202420252026
808.40M
0
(LITE) Total Revenue
(NEM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


LITE and NEM have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LITE has higher volatility (28.12%) compared to NEM (15.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LITE dropped -66.89% vs NEM's -81.30%.

LITE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.43 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LITE and NEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer