PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LITE vs. MPWR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LITE vs. MPWR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lumentum Holdings Inc. (LITE) and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LITE achieves a 93.69% return, which is significantly higher than MPWR's 57.89% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LITE having a 37.52% annualized return and MPWR not far behind at 36.06%.


LITE

1D
2.99%
1M
-10.89%
6M
82.20%
YTD
93.69%
1Y
548.56%
3Y*
140.32%
5Y*
53.42%
10Y*
37.52%
ALL TIME*
36.04%

MPWR

1D
8.35%
1M
7.08%
6M
27.30%
YTD
57.89%
1Y
101.90%
3Y*
38.39%
5Y*
26.91%
10Y*
36.06%
ALL TIME*
27.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.39B$3.22B$4.79B
$1.37B$1.27B$1.35B

LITE vs. MPWR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LITE
Lumentum Holdings Inc.
93.69%339.06%60.15%0.48%-50.68%11.57%19.55%88.76%-14.09%26.52%
MPWR
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
57.89%54.45%-5.55%79.78%-27.78%35.49%107.49%54.80%4.49%38.23%

Correlation

The correlation between LITE and MPWR is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2015

0.50

The correlation between LITE and MPWR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LITE:

$55.54B

MPWR:

$70.06B

EPS

LITE:

$5.03

MPWR:

$16.33

PE Ratio

LITE:

141.90

MPWR:

87.33

PS Ratio

LITE:

25.09

MPWR:

21.32

PB Ratio

LITE:

23.10

MPWR:

18.03

Total Revenue (TTM)

LITE:

$2.49B

MPWR:

$3.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LITE:

$938.50M

MPWR:

$1.81B

EBITDA (TTM)

LITE:

$470.10M

MPWR:

$1.01B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LITE vs. MPWR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LITE
LITE Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
LITE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LITE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
LITE Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
LITE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
LITE Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

MPWR
MPWR Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
MPWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MPWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
MPWR Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
MPWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
MPWR Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LITE vs. MPWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lumentum Holdings Inc. (LITE) and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LITEMPWRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.30

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

12.93

3.94

+8.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

44.86

9.44

+35.42

LITE vs. MPWR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LITE Sharpe Ratio is 5.95, which is higher than the MPWR Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LITE and MPWR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LITE vs. MPWR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LITE drawdown since its inception was -66.89%, smaller than the maximum MPWR drawdown of -72.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LITE and MPWR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LITEMPWRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.89%

-72.27%

+5.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.80%

-25.99%

-16.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.63%

-51.65%

+1.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.48%

-51.65%

-14.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.89%

-51.65%

-15.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.21%

-15.49%

-16.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.59%

-17.71%

-5.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.31%

10.83%

+1.48%

Volatility

LITE vs. MPWR - Volatility Comparison

Lumentum Holdings Inc. (LITE) has a higher volatility of 31.86% compared to Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) at 18.57%. This indicates that LITE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MPWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LITEMPWRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

31.86%

18.57%

+13.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

70.58%

44.07%

+26.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

93.02%

54.05%

+38.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.98%

54.63%

+7.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

57.45%

47.86%

+9.59%

Dividends

LITE vs. MPWR - Dividend Comparison

LITE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MPWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LITE
Lumentum Holdings Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MPWR
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
0.50%0.69%0.85%0.63%0.85%0.49%0.55%0.90%1.03%0.71%0.98%1.26%

Financials

LITE vs. MPWR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lumentum Holdings Inc. and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

LITE vs. MPWR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lumentum Holdings Inc. and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

LITE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lumentum Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 357.00M and revenue of 808.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.2%.

MPWR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 541.07M and revenue of 980.64M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.2%.

LITE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lumentum Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 174.50M and revenue of 808.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 21.6%.

MPWR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 303.89M and revenue of 980.64M, resulting in an operating margin of 31.0%.

LITE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lumentum Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 144.20M and revenue of 808.40M, resulting in a net margin of 17.8%.

MPWR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. reported a net income of 257.30M and revenue of 980.64M, resulting in a net margin of 26.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LITE and MPWR have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LITE has higher volatility (31.86%) compared to MPWR (18.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LITE dropped -66.89% vs MPWR's -72.27%.

LITE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.95 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LITE and MPWR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer