LIRKX vs. NASDX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LIRKX (BlackRock LifePath Index Retirement Fund) and NASDX (Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares) are both mutual funds - LIRKX is a Target Retirement Date fund tracking the BlackRock LifePath Index Retirement Custom Benchmark (USD), while NASDX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LIRKX returned 6.01%/yr vs 22.58%/yr for NASDX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LIRKX charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for NASDX.

Performance

LIRKX vs. NASDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock LifePath Index Retirement Fund (LIRKX) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIRKX achieves a 5.84% return, which is significantly lower than NASDX's 21.38% return. Over the past 10 years, LIRKX has underperformed NASDX with an annualized return of 6.01%, while NASDX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.58% annualized return.

LIRKX

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 2.20%
• YTD: 5.84%
• 6M: 6.09%
• 1Y: 14.71%
• 3Y*: 10.18%
• 5Y*: 4.26%
• 10Y*: 6.01%

NASDX

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: 10.94%
• YTD: 21.38%
• 6M: 19.90%
• 1Y: 42.08%
• 3Y*: 32.65%
• 5Y*: 20.44%
• 10Y*: 22.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LIRKX vs. NASDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LIRKX BlackRock LifePath Index Retirement Fund	5.84%	12.48%	6.08%	11.48%	-15.21%	6.75%	11.46%	15.90%	-3.50%	10.75%
NASDX Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares	21.38%	21.00%	36.91%	54.69%	-32.57%	27.32%	48.59%	38.22%	-1.21%	31.27%

Correlation

The correlation between LIRKX and NASDX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.72
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2011	0.78

The correlation between LIRKX and NASDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LIRKX vs. NASDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIRKX

LIRKX Risk / Return Rank: 81
LIRKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
LIRKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
LIRKX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
LIRKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
LIRKX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

NASDX

NASDX Risk / Return Rank: 75
NASDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
NASDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
NASDX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
NASDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
NASDX Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIRKX vs. NASDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock LifePath Index Retirement Fund (LIRKX) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LIRKX	NASDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.68	2.70	-0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.90	3.51	+0.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.46	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.51	3.65	-0.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.84	14.16	+1.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LIRKX vs. NASDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIRKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is comparable to the NASDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIRKX and NASDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LIRKX	NASDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.68	2.70	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55	0.89	-0.34
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.80	1.00	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.80	0.33	+0.47

Drawdowns

LIRKX vs. NASDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIRKX drawdown since its inception was -20.46%, smaller than the maximum NASDX drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIRKX and NASDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LIRKX	NASDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.46%	-83.16%	+62.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.23%	-11.90%	+7.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.55%	-22.71%	+15.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.46%	-35.33%	+14.87%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-20.46%	-35.33%	+14.87%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.83%	-34.37%	+31.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.94%	3.06%	-2.12%

Volatility

LIRKX vs. NASDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock LifePath Index Retirement Fund (LIRKX) is 1.98%, while Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX) has a volatility of 4.51%. This indicates that LIRKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NASDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LIRKX	NASDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.98%	4.51%	-2.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.52%	12.19%	-7.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.54%	16.10%	-10.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.82%	23.06%	-15.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.51%	22.68%	-15.17%

LIRKX vs. NASDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LIRKX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than NASDX's 0.63% expense ratio.

Dividends

LIRKX vs. NASDX - Dividend Comparison

LIRKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, more than NASDX's 2.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LIRKX BlackRock LifePath Index Retirement Fund	3.67%	3.89%	2.06%	2.67%	2.75%	2.74%	1.98%	2.48%	2.50%	2.28%	2.53%	2.98%
NASDX Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares	2.98%	3.76%	16.95%	7.61%	3.75%	2.59%	1.28%	7.09%	2.47%	1.65%	0.75%	0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LIRKX and NASDX in my portfolio?

LIRKX and NASDX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LIRKX or NASDX?

NASDX has higher volatility (4.51%) compared to LIRKX (1.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIRKX dropped -20.46% vs NASDX's -83.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NASDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.