LIRKX vs. FFFAX
LIRKX (BlackRock LifePath Index Retirement Fund) and FFFAX (Fidelity Freedom Income Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 10 years, LIRKX returned 6.08%/yr vs 4.60%/yr for FFFAX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LIRKX charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for FFFAX.
Performance
LIRKX vs. FFFAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LIRKX achieves a 5.30% return, which is significantly higher than FFFAX's 4.83% return. Over the past 10 years, LIRKX has outperformed FFFAX with an annualized return of 6.08%, while FFFAX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.60% annualized return.
LIRKX
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- YTD
- 5.30%
- 6M
- 5.07%
- 1Y
- 13.02%
- 3Y*
- 9.88%
- 5Y*
- 4.03%
- 10Y*
- 6.08%
FFFAX
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 1.07%
- YTD
- 4.83%
- 6M
- 4.77%
- 1Y
- 10.53%
- 3Y*
- 7.93%
- 5Y*
- 3.20%
- 10Y*
- 4.60%
LIRKX vs. FFFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LIRKX BlackRock LifePath Index Retirement Fund | 5.30% | 12.48% | 6.08% | 11.48% | -15.21% | 6.75% | 11.46% | 15.90% | -3.50% | 10.75% |
FFFAX Fidelity Freedom Income Fund | 4.83% | 10.42% | 4.34% | 8.18% | -11.33% | 3.12% | 8.93% | 10.74% | -1.99% | 8.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between LIRKX and FFFAX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2011 | 0.89 |
The correlation between LIRKX and FFFAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LIRKX vs. FFFAX — Risk / Return Rank
LIRKX
FFFAX
LIRKX vs. FFFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock LifePath Index Retirement Fund (LIRKX) and Fidelity Freedom Income Fund (FFFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LIRKX | FFFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.45 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.22 | 2.99 | +0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.17 | 12.83 | +1.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LIRKX vs. FFFAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LIRKX drawdown since its inception was -20.46%, which is greater than FFFAX's maximum drawdown of -17.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIRKX and FFFAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LIRKX | FFFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.46% | -17.96% | -2.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.23% | -3.68% | -0.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.55% | -4.91% | -2.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.46% | -15.87% | -4.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.46% | -15.87% | -4.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | -0.25% | -0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.82% | -1.79% | -1.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.96% | 0.85% | +0.11% |
Volatility
LIRKX vs. FFFAX - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock LifePath Index Retirement Fund (LIRKX) and Fidelity Freedom Income Fund (FFFAX) have volatilities of 2.40% and 2.29%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LIRKX | FFFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.40% | 2.29% | +0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.96% | 4.35% | +0.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.92% | 4.99% | +0.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.88% | 5.45% | +2.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.54% | 4.68% | +2.86% |
LIRKX vs. FFFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LIRKX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than FFFAX's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
LIRKX vs. FFFAX - Dividend Comparison
LIRKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, more than FFFAX's 2.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFFAX Fidelity Freedom Income Fund | 2.95% | 3.29% | 3.13% | 2.92% | 5.89% | 6.12% | 4.37% | 3.65% | 5.17% | 3.74% | 3.21% | 3.28% |
LIRKX BlackRock LifePath Index Retirement Fund | 3.69% | 3.89% | 2.06% | 2.67% | 2.75% | 2.74% | 1.98% | 2.48% | 2.50% | 2.28% | 2.53% | 2.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, LIRKX and FFFAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
LIRKX has higher volatility (2.40%) compared to FFFAX (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIRKX dropped -20.46% vs FFFAX's -17.96%.
LIRKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LIRKX and FFFAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer