PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LIQT vs. PFE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LIQT vs. PFE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LiqTech International, Inc. (LIQT) and Pfizer Inc. (PFE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIQT achieves a -20.55% return, which is significantly lower than PFE's 6.05% return. Over the past 10 years, LIQT has underperformed PFE with an annualized return of -25.71%, while PFE has yielded a comparatively higher 1.94% annualized return.


LIQT

1D
10.48%
1M
-47.51%
YTD
-20.55%
6M
-37.30%
1Y
-30.95%
3Y*
-29.71%
5Y*
-53.88%
10Y*
-25.71%

PFE

1D
-0.31%
1M
-1.36%
YTD
6.05%
6M
5.00%
1Y
16.52%
3Y*
-7.06%
5Y*
-3.26%
10Y*
1.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LIQT vs. PFE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LIQT
LiqTech International, Inc.
-20.55%-20.78%-45.96%12.17%-93.36%-28.50%36.75%6.75%140.35%-10.94%
PFE
Pfizer Inc.
6.05%0.65%-2.22%-41.26%-10.41%66.70%3.07%-6.91%24.82%15.90%

Correlation

The correlation between LIQT and PFE is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2012

0.07

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LIQT:

$11.42M

PFE:

$146.43B

EPS

LIQT:

-$0.92

PFE:

$1.31

PS Ratio

LIQT:

0.70

PFE:

2.30

PB Ratio

LIQT:

1.50

PFE:

1.63

Total Revenue (TTM)

LIQT:

$16.03M

PFE:

$63.32B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LIQT:

$1.52M

PFE:

$43.91B

EBITDA (TTM)

LIQT:

-$5.85M

PFE:

$16.94B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LIQT vs. PFE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIQT
LIQT Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
LIQT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LIQT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
LIQT Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
LIQT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
LIQT Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

PFE
PFE Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
PFE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFE Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
PFE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIQT vs. PFE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LiqTech International, Inc. (LIQT) and Pfizer Inc. (PFE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LIQTPFEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.31

0.70

-1.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.20

1.20

-1.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.14

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.45

1.43

-1.87

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.91

2.97

-3.88

LIQT vs. PFE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIQT Sharpe Ratio is -0.31, which is lower than the PFE Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIQT and PFE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LIQTPFEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.31

0.70

-1.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.70

-0.13

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.33

0.08

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.34

0.23

-0.58

Drawdowns

LIQT vs. PFE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIQT drawdown since its inception was -99.27%, which is greater than PFE's maximum drawdown of -58.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIQT and PFE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LIQTPFEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.27%

-58.96%

-40.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-64.53%

-11.47%

-53.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-74.64%

-40.75%

-33.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-98.37%

-58.96%

-39.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.90%

-58.96%

-39.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.19%

-47.05%

-52.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-73.80%

-17.68%

-56.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.80%

5.51%

+26.29%

Volatility

LIQT vs. PFE - Volatility Comparison

LiqTech International, Inc. (LIQT) has a higher volatility of 41.92% compared to Pfizer Inc. (PFE) at 4.00%. This indicates that LIQT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LIQTPFEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

41.92%

4.00%

+37.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

79.87%

14.73%

+65.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

101.25%

23.84%

+77.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

76.80%

25.49%

+51.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

77.69%

23.88%

+53.81%

Dividends

LIQT vs. PFE - Dividend Comparison

LIQT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PFE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.73%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LIQT
LiqTech International, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PFE
Pfizer Inc.
6.73%6.91%6.33%5.70%3.12%2.64%3.92%3.68%3.12%3.53%3.69%3.47%

Financials

LIQT vs. PFE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LiqTech International, Inc. and Pfizer Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B20222023202420252026
4.14M
14.45B
(LIQT) Total Revenue
(PFE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LIQT vs. PFE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between LiqTech International, Inc. and Pfizer Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
9.5%
67.3%
Portfolio components
LIQT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LiqTech International, Inc. reported a gross profit of 393.74K and revenue of 4.14M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.5%.

PFE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pfizer Inc. reported a gross profit of 9.72B and revenue of 14.45B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.3%.

LIQT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LiqTech International, Inc. reported an operating income of -2.28M and revenue of 4.14M, resulting in an operating margin of -55.1%.

PFE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pfizer Inc. reported an operating income of 4.03B and revenue of 14.45B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.9%.

LIQT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LiqTech International, Inc. reported a net income of -2.71M and revenue of 4.14M, resulting in a net margin of -65.5%.

PFE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pfizer Inc. reported a net income of 2.69B and revenue of 14.45B, resulting in a net margin of 18.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LIQT and PFE have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LIQT has higher volatility (41.92%) compared to PFE (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIQT dropped -99.27% vs PFE's -58.96%.

PFE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.70 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LIQT and PFE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer