PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LIPKX vs. FFFFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LIPKX vs. FFFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock LifePath Index 2050 Fund Class K (LIPKX) and Fidelity Freedom 2040 Fund (FFFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with LIPKX having a 12.50% return and FFFFX slightly lower at 12.13%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LIPKX having a 11.76% annualized return and FFFFX not far ahead at 11.98%.


LIPKX

1D
0.43%
1M
5.32%
YTD
12.50%
6M
13.26%
1Y
28.65%
3Y*
19.17%
5Y*
10.07%
10Y*
11.76%

FFFFX

1D
0.56%
1M
4.48%
YTD
12.13%
6M
13.76%
1Y
28.02%
3Y*
19.14%
5Y*
9.53%
10Y*
11.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LIPKX vs. FFFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LIPKX
BlackRock LifePath Index 2050 Fund Class K
12.50%20.71%12.88%21.38%-18.34%18.74%14.28%26.78%-7.81%21.43%
FFFFX
Fidelity Freedom 2040 Fund
12.13%22.01%13.20%20.06%-18.31%16.57%18.24%25.38%-8.94%22.26%

Correlation

The correlation between LIPKX and FFFFX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2011

0.97

The correlation between LIPKX and FFFFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LIPKX vs. FFFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIPKX
LIPKX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
LIPKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LIPKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
LIPKX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
LIPKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
LIPKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

FFFFX
FFFFX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FFFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FFFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIPKX vs. FFFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock LifePath Index 2050 Fund Class K (LIPKX) and Fidelity Freedom 2040 Fund (FFFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LIPKXFFFFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.43

2.50

-0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.37

3.46

-0.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.47

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

3.27

-0.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.13

14.39

-0.26

LIPKX vs. FFFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIPKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is comparable to the FFFFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIPKX and FFFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LIPKXFFFFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

2.50

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.67

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.80

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.38

+0.24

Drawdowns

LIPKX vs. FFFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIPKX drawdown since its inception was -34.29%, smaller than the maximum FFFFX drawdown of -54.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIPKX and FFFFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LIPKXFFFFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.29%

-54.10%

+19.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.09%

-8.71%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.06%

-14.08%

-2.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.35%

-27.21%

+0.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.29%

-30.93%

-3.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.51%

-11.14%

+6.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

1.97%

+0.08%

Volatility

LIPKX vs. FFFFX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock LifePath Index 2050 Fund Class K (LIPKX) and Fidelity Freedom 2040 Fund (FFFFX) have volatilities of 3.76% and 3.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LIPKXFFFFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.76%

3.76%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.63%

9.36%

+0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.99%

11.39%

+0.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.50%

14.37%

+1.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.51%

15.07%

+1.44%

LIPKX vs. FFFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LIPKX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than FFFFX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

LIPKX vs. FFFFX - Dividend Comparison

LIPKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, less than FFFFX's 6.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFFFX
Fidelity Freedom 2040 Fund
6.35%5.07%2.63%1.72%12.33%12.09%5.67%6.69%7.97%4.37%4.05%4.81%
LIPKX
BlackRock LifePath Index 2050 Fund Class K
2.51%2.82%0.01%2.14%2.08%2.20%1.11%3.33%2.42%2.36%1.60%3.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, LIPKX and FFFFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FFFFX has higher volatility (3.76%) compared to LIPKX (3.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIPKX dropped -34.29% vs FFFFX's -54.10%.

FFFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LIPKX and FFFFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer