LIPKX vs. ASFYX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LIPKX (BlackRock LifePath Index 2050 Fund Class K) and ASFYX (AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y) are both mutual funds - LIPKX is a Target Retirement Date fund tracking the BlackRock LifePath Index 2050 Custom Benchmark (USD), while ASFYX is a Systematic Trend fund managed by BlackRock. Over the past 10 years, LIPKX returned 11.76%/yr vs 2.97%/yr for ASFYX. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LIPKX charges 0.09%/yr vs 1.47%/yr for ASFYX.

Performance

LIPKX vs. ASFYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock LifePath Index 2050 Fund Class K (LIPKX) and AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIPKX achieves a 12.50% return, which is significantly lower than ASFYX's 15.25% return. Over the past 10 years, LIPKX has outperformed ASFYX with an annualized return of 11.76%, while ASFYX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.97% annualized return.

LIPKX

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: 5.32%
• YTD: 12.50%
• 6M: 13.26%
• 1Y: 28.65%
• 3Y*: 19.17%
• 5Y*: 10.07%
• 10Y*: 11.76%

ASFYX

• 1D: 0.56%
• 1M: 1.71%
• YTD: 15.25%
• 6M: 17.77%
• 1Y: 26.49%
• 3Y*: -1.44%
• 5Y*: 3.02%
• 10Y*: 2.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LIPKX vs. ASFYX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LIPKX BlackRock LifePath Index 2050 Fund Class K	12.50%	20.71%	12.88%	21.38%	-18.34%	18.74%	14.28%	26.78%	-7.81%	21.43%
ASFYX AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y	15.25%	-9.67%	-3.22%	-10.33%	35.67%	3.52%	13.59%	8.99%	-12.59%	6.78%

Correlation

The correlation between LIPKX and ASFYX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.34
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2011	0.20

Over the past year, LIPKX and ASFYX have become more correlated (0.49) than their long-term average of 0.20, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

LIPKX vs. ASFYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIPKX

LIPKX Risk / Return Rank: 68
LIPKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
LIPKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
LIPKX Omega Ratio Rank: 62
LIPKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
LIPKX Martin Ratio Rank: 75

ASFYX

ASFYX Risk / Return Rank: 67
ASFYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
ASFYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
ASFYX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
ASFYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
ASFYX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIPKX vs. ASFYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock LifePath Index 2050 Fund Class K (LIPKX) and AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LIPKX	ASFYX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.43	2.20	+0.22
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.37	2.93	+0.44
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.39	+0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.20	4.95	-1.75
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.13	17.88	-3.76
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LIPKX vs. ASFYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIPKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is comparable to the ASFYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIPKX and ASFYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LIPKX	ASFYX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.43	2.20	+0.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	0.22	+0.43
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71	0.23	+0.48
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.62	0.35	+0.27

Drawdowns

LIPKX vs. ASFYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIPKX drawdown since its inception was -34.29%, smaller than the maximum ASFYX drawdown of -36.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIPKX and ASFYX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LIPKX	ASFYX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.29%	-36.43%	+2.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.09%	-5.24%	-3.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.06%	-30.32%	+13.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.35%	-36.43%	+10.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.29%	-36.43%	+2.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-18.22%	+18.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.51%	-13.18%	+8.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.05%	1.45%	+0.60%

Volatility

LIPKX vs. ASFYX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock LifePath Index 2050 Fund Class K (LIPKX) and AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX) have volatilities of 3.76% and 3.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LIPKX	ASFYX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.76%	3.67%	+0.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.63%	9.54%	+0.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.99%	11.77%	+0.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.50%	13.77%	+1.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.51%	12.71%	+3.80%

LIPKX vs. ASFYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LIPKX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than ASFYX's 1.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

LIPKX vs. ASFYX - Dividend Comparison

LIPKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, more than ASFYX's 1.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASFYX AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y	1.32%	1.52%	1.46%	0.99%	32.48%	6.07%	3.40%	5.51%	1.30%	0.07%	0.01%	5.06%
LIPKX BlackRock LifePath Index 2050 Fund Class K	2.51%	2.82%	0.01%	2.14%	2.08%	2.20%	1.11%	3.33%	2.42%	2.36%	1.60%	3.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LIPKX and ASFYX in my portfolio?

LIPKX and ASFYX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LIPKX or ASFYX?

LIPKX has higher volatility (3.76%) compared to ASFYX (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIPKX dropped -34.29% vs ASFYX's -36.43%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LIPKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.