PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LINKX vs. STLDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LINKX vs. STLDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock LifePath Index 2030 Fund (LINKX) and BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2030 Fund (STLDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LINKX achieves a 6.73% return, which is significantly lower than STLDX's 7.33% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LINKX having a 7.87% annualized return and STLDX not far ahead at 7.98%.


LINKX

1D
0.10%
1M
2.13%
YTD
6.73%
6M
7.27%
1Y
17.01%
3Y*
11.59%
5Y*
5.21%
10Y*
7.87%

STLDX

1D
0.19%
1M
2.15%
YTD
7.33%
6M
8.15%
1Y
16.52%
3Y*
10.90%
5Y*
4.91%
10Y*
7.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LINKX vs. STLDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LINKX
BlackRock LifePath Index 2030 Fund
6.73%14.19%6.31%14.58%-16.42%11.27%12.22%21.09%-5.56%16.36%
STLDX
BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2030 Fund
7.33%13.59%3.65%15.65%-15.85%11.43%13.06%22.09%-5.41%15.48%

Correlation

The correlation between LINKX and STLDX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2011

0.95

The correlation between LINKX and STLDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LINKX vs. STLDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LINKX
LINKX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
LINKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LINKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
LINKX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
LINKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
LINKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

STLDX
STLDX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
STLDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STLDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
STLDX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
STLDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
STLDX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LINKX vs. STLDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock LifePath Index 2030 Fund (LINKX) and BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2030 Fund (STLDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LINKXSTLDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.55

2.16

+0.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.68

3.11

+0.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.40

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.26

3.09

+0.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.46

13.38

+1.08

LINKX vs. STLDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LINKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is comparable to the STLDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LINKX and STLDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LINKXSTLDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.55

2.16

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.44

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.71

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.51

+0.14

Drawdowns

LINKX vs. STLDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LINKX drawdown since its inception was -24.19%, smaller than the maximum STLDX drawdown of -48.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LINKX and STLDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LINKXSTLDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.19%

-48.43%

+24.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.31%

-5.60%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.76%

-14.58%

+3.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.68%

-22.56%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.19%

-26.95%

+2.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.66%

-8.24%

+4.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.20%

1.29%

-0.09%

Volatility

LINKX vs. STLDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock LifePath Index 2030 Fund (LINKX) is 2.32%, while BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2030 Fund (STLDX) has a volatility of 2.46%. This indicates that LINKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STLDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LINKXSTLDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.32%

2.46%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.48%

6.35%

-0.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.83%

7.96%

-1.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.98%

11.22%

-1.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.88%

11.30%

-0.42%

LINKX vs. STLDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LINKX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than STLDX's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

LINKX vs. STLDX - Dividend Comparison

LINKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, less than STLDX's 3.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LINKX
BlackRock LifePath Index 2030 Fund
3.11%3.32%0.02%2.53%2.58%2.52%1.27%3.26%2.44%2.33%2.41%3.08%
STLDX
BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2030 Fund
3.81%4.09%0.96%3.16%2.04%16.80%3.86%6.33%13.50%12.92%2.00%9.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, LINKX and STLDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

STLDX has higher volatility (2.46%) compared to LINKX (2.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LINKX dropped -24.19% vs STLDX's -48.43%.

LINKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LINKX and STLDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer