PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LINE vs. FLDR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LINE vs. FLDR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lineage, Inc. (LINE) and Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LINE achieves a 23.81% return, which is significantly higher than FLDR's 1.78% return.


LINE

1D
4.05%
1M
2.16%
YTD
23.81%
6M
25.39%
1Y
2.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FLDR

1D
0.06%
1M
0.49%
YTD
1.78%
6M
1.90%
1Y
4.62%
3Y*
5.38%
5Y*
3.75%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LINE vs. FLDR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
LINE
Lineage, Inc.
23.81%-37.20%-27.57%
FLDR
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF
1.78%5.41%2.26%

Correlation

The correlation between LINE and FLDR is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2024

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LINE vs. FLDR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LINE
LINE Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
LINE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LINE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
LINE Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
LINE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
LINE Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

FLDR
FLDR Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
FLDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLDR Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FLDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLDR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LINE vs. FLDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lineage, Inc. (LINE) and Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LINEFLDRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-5.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-9.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

2.65

-1.60

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.10

9.92

-9.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.19

67.62

-67.43

LINE vs. FLDR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LINE Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is lower than the FLDR Sharpe Ratio of 5.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LINE and FLDR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LINE vs. FLDR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LINE drawdown since its inception was -61.74%, which is greater than FLDR's maximum drawdown of -12.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LINE and FLDR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LINEFLDRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.74%

-12.23%

-49.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.78%

-0.47%

-26.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.87%

0.00%

-47.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.13%

-0.35%

-40.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.50%

0.07%

+13.43%

Volatility

LINE vs. FLDR - Volatility Comparison

Lineage, Inc. (LINE) has a higher volatility of 11.24% compared to Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR) at 0.19%. This indicates that LINE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLDR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LINEFLDRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.24%

0.19%

+11.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.56%

0.60%

+27.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.12%

0.81%

+37.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.72%

1.21%

+35.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.72%

5.24%

+31.48%

Dividends

LINE vs. FLDR - Dividend Comparison

LINE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.96%, more than FLDR's 4.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FLDR
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF
4.41%4.66%5.50%5.28%2.09%0.51%1.22%2.69%1.38%
LINE
Lineage, Inc.
4.96%6.03%1.55%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LINE and FLDR have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LINE has higher volatility (11.24%) compared to FLDR (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LINE dropped -61.74% vs FLDR's -12.23%.

FLDR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.73 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LINE and FLDR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer