LIN vs. ROST
LIN (Linde plc) and ROST (Ross Stores, Inc.) are both stocks. LIN operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials), while ROST operates in Apparel Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, LIN returned 13.98%/yr vs 16.14%/yr for ROST. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LIN vs. ROST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LIN achieves a 23.59% return, which is significantly lower than ROST's 33.85% return.
LIN
- 1D
- 1.58%
- 1M
- 2.65%
- YTD
- 23.59%
- 6M
- 26.61%
- 1Y
- 13.87%
- 3Y*
- 13.38%
- 5Y*
- 13.98%
- 10Y*
- —
ROST
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 12.82%
- YTD
- 33.85%
- 6M
- 32.41%
- 1Y
- 83.78%
- 3Y*
- 32.49%
- 5Y*
- 16.14%
- 10Y*
- 17.29%
LIN vs. ROST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LIN Linde plc | 23.59% | 3.22% | 3.18% | 27.66% | -4.39% | 33.39% | 25.88% | 39.04% | -5.26% |
ROST Ross Stores, Inc. | 33.85% | 20.41% | 10.39% | 20.64% | 2.94% | -6.03% | 5.81% | 41.72% | -15.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between LIN and ROST is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2018 | 0.39 |
The correlation between LIN and ROST shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.39 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LIN:
$244.15B
ROST:
$77.14B
LIN:
$15.16
ROST:
$7.15
LIN:
34.54
ROST:
33.57
LIN:
1.72
ROST:
3.80
LIN:
7.10
ROST:
3.27
LIN:
6.33
ROST:
11.69
LIN:
$34.66B
ROST:
$23.78B
LIN:
$15.94B
ROST:
$4.95B
LIN:
$12.31B
ROST:
$3.62B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LIN vs. ROST — Risk / Return Rank
LIN
ROST
LIN vs. ROST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Linde plc (LIN) and Ross Stores, Inc. (ROST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LIN | ROST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.63 | -0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.67 | 10.52 | -9.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.89 | 38.37 | -36.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LIN vs. ROST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LIN drawdown since its inception was -32.59%, smaller than the maximum ROST drawdown of -82.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIN and ROST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LIN | ROST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.59% | -82.23% | +49.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.18% | -7.79% | -11.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.18% | -21.08% | +1.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.82% | -44.13% | +21.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -51.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.41% | -17.93% | +12.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.79% | 2.25% | +4.54% |
Volatility
LIN vs. ROST - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Linde plc (LIN) is 5.57%, while Ross Stores, Inc. (ROST) has a volatility of 10.90%. This indicates that LIN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LIN | ROST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.57% | 10.90% | -5.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.53% | 18.51% | -4.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.24% | 24.63% | -7.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.79% | 29.55% | -8.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.08% | 31.62% | -7.54% |
Dividends
LIN vs. ROST - Dividend Comparison
LIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, more than ROST's 0.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LIN Linde plc | 1.18% | 1.41% | 1.33% | 1.24% | 1.43% | 1.22% | 1.46% | 1.64% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ROST Ross Stores, Inc. | 0.71% | 0.90% | 0.97% | 0.97% | 1.07% | 1.00% | 0.23% | 1.10% | 1.08% | 0.80% | 0.82% | 4.59% |
Financials
LIN vs. ROST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Linde plc and Ross Stores, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LIN vs. ROST - Profitability Comparison
LIN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Linde plc reported a gross profit of 4.26B and revenue of 8.78B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.5%.
ROST - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ross Stores, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 6.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
LIN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Linde plc reported an operating income of 3.26B and revenue of 8.78B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.2%.
ROST - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ross Stores, Inc. reported an operating income of 804.03M and revenue of 6.01B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.4%.
LIN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Linde plc reported a net income of 1.86B and revenue of 8.78B, resulting in a net margin of 21.2%.
ROST - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ross Stores, Inc. reported a net income of 649.96M and revenue of 6.01B, resulting in a net margin of 10.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LIN and ROST have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ROST has higher volatility (10.90%) compared to LIN (5.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIN dropped -32.59% vs ROST's -82.23%.
ROST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.34 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LIN and ROST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer