LIMIX vs. VRGWX

Last updated Jul 31, 2026

LIMIX (Cromwell Tran Focus Fund) and VRGWX (Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, LIMIX returned 10.50%/yr vs 17.38%/yr for VRGWX. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. LIMIX charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VRGWX.

Performance

LIMIX vs. VRGWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cromwell Tran Focus Fund (LIMIX) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRGWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIMIX achieves a 6.45% return, which is significantly higher than VRGWX's -3.37% return. Over the past 10 years, LIMIX has underperformed VRGWX with an annualized return of 10.50%, while VRGWX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.38% annualized return.

LIMIX

• 1D: -2.46%
• 1M: -7.69%
• 6M: 4.90%
• YTD: 6.45%
• 1Y: 3.87%
• 3Y*: 12.41%
• 5Y*: 2.63%
• 10Y*: 10.50%
• ALL TIME*: 8.55%

VRGWX

• 1D: -2.10%
• 1M: -8.24%
• 6M: -2.66%
• YTD: -3.37%
• 1Y: 4.13%
• 3Y*: 17.75%
• 5Y*: 11.80%
• 10Y*: 17.38%
• ALL TIME*: 16.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LIMIX Cromwell Tran Focus Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
VRGWX Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

LIMIX vs. VRGWX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LIMIX Cromwell Tran Focus Fund	6.45%	7.51%	15.44%	26.03%	-35.23%	25.39%	29.59%	41.84%	-10.15%	21.10%
VRGWX Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares	-3.37%	18.32%	33.25%	42.65%	-29.18%	32.42%	38.38%	36.30%	-1.59%	30.11%

Correlation

The correlation between LIMIX and VRGWX is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.84
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010	0.88

The correlation between LIMIX and VRGWX shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LIMIX vs. VRGWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LIMIX

LIMIX Risk / Return Rank: 8
LIMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
LIMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
LIMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8
LIMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
LIMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9

VRGWX

VRGWX Risk / Return Rank: 7
VRGWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
VRGWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
VRGWX Omega Ratio Rank: 7
VRGWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
VRGWX Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LIMIX vs. VRGWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cromwell Tran Focus Fund (LIMIX) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRGWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LIMIX	VRGWX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.18	0.26	-0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.40	0.47	-0.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.06	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.29	0.27	+0.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.88	0.82	+0.05

LIMIX vs. VRGWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIMIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is comparable to the VRGWX Sharpe Ratio of 0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIMIX and VRGWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LIMIX vs. VRGWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIMIX drawdown since its inception was -48.54%, which is greater than VRGWX's maximum drawdown of -32.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIMIX and VRGWX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LIMIX	VRGWX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.54%	-32.70%	-15.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.15%	-16.19%	+4.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.56%	-23.44%	-1.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.06%	-32.70%	-6.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.06%	-32.70%	-6.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.01%	-11.34%	+3.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.97%	-4.88%	-5.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.07%	5.35%	-1.28%

Volatility

LIMIX vs. VRGWX - Volatility Comparison

Cromwell Tran Focus Fund (LIMIX) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRGWX) have volatilities of 5.92% and 5.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LIMIX	VRGWX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.92%	5.89%	+0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.05%	13.75%	+2.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.44%	17.27%	+2.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.27%	21.90%	+0.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.27%	21.27%	0.00%

LIMIX vs. VRGWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LIMIX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than VRGWX's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

LIMIX vs. VRGWX - Dividend Comparison

LIMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.59%, more than VRGWX's 0.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LIMIX Cromwell Tran Focus Fund	11.59%	12.33%	0.12%	0.00%	11.31%	20.68%	13.21%	15.96%	25.90%	26.44%	26.77%	26.69%
VRGWX Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares	0.50%	0.35%	0.56%	0.71%	0.99%	4.18%	0.77%	1.03%	1.22%	1.22%	1.52%	1.51%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LIMIX and VRGWX in my portfolio?

LIMIX and VRGWX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LIMIX or VRGWX?

LIMIX has higher volatility (5.92%) compared to VRGWX (5.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIMIX dropped -48.54% vs VRGWX's -32.70%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VRGWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.26 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.