PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LIMI vs. FTRI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LIMI vs. FTRI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes Lithium & Battery Metal Miners ETF (LIMI) and First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF (FTRI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIMI achieves a -7.47% return, which is significantly lower than FTRI's 4.07% return.


LIMI

1D
-1.07%
1M
-20.27%
6M
-17.03%
YTD
-7.47%
1Y
67.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FTRI

1D
0.53%
1M
-4.31%
6M
-1.41%
YTD
4.07%
1Y
13.71%
3Y*
12.28%
5Y*
7.62%
10Y*
9.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LIMI vs. FTRI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LIMI and FTRI is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2024

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LIMI vs. FTRI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIMI
LIMI Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
LIMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LIMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
LIMI Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
LIMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
LIMI Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

FTRI
FTRI Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
FTRI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTRI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTRI Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
FTRI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTRI Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIMI vs. FTRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Lithium & Battery Metal Miners ETF (LIMI) and First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF (FTRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LIMIFTRIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.14

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

0.80

+1.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.50

2.26

+4.24

LIMI vs. FTRI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIMI Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is higher than the FTRI Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIMI and FTRI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LIMI vs. FTRI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIMI drawdown since its inception was -43.77%, roughly equal to the maximum FTRI drawdown of -43.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIMI and FTRI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LIMIFTRIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.77%

-43.82%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.47%

-17.04%

-14.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.47%

-14.68%

-16.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.42%

-8.52%

-4.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.03%

6.03%

+4.00%

Volatility

LIMI vs. FTRI - Volatility Comparison

Themes Lithium & Battery Metal Miners ETF (LIMI) has a higher volatility of 12.96% compared to First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF (FTRI) at 6.00%. This indicates that LIMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTRI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LIMIFTRIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.96%

6.00%

+6.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.72%

14.97%

+15.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.09%

18.28%

+26.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.82%

20.77%

+21.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.82%

21.90%

+19.92%

LIMI vs. FTRI - Expense Ratio Comparison

LIMI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FTRI's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

LIMI vs. FTRI - Dividend Comparison

LIMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, less than FTRI's 2.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTRI
First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF
2.16%2.35%4.29%6.56%8.37%6.58%3.64%6.25%4.24%3.60%2.96%0.89%
LIMI
Themes Lithium & Battery Metal Miners ETF
0.59%0.54%8.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LIMI and FTRI have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LIMI has higher volatility (12.96%) compared to FTRI (6.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIMI dropped -43.77% vs FTRI's -43.82%.

On 1-year performance, LIMI leads with 67.12% vs 13.71% for FTRI. On fees, LIMI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, FTRI has been the lower-risk option at 6.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, LIMI has performed better with a 67.12% return vs 13.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LIMI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FTRI.

FTRI has the higher dividend yield at 2.16%, compared with 0.59% for LIMI.

LIMI is categorized as Lithium & Battery Metals, while FTRI is Natural Resources. LIMI tracks BITA Global Lithium and Battery Metals Select Index, while FTRI tracks Indxx Global Natural Resources Income Index. They also come from different issuers: Themes and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for LIMI and 0.70% for FTRI.

LIMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LIMI and FTRI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer