LIMI vs. DBO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LIMI (Themes Lithium & Battery Metal Miners ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - LIMI is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the BITA Global Lithium and Battery Metals Select Index, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, LIMI returned 160.78% vs 80.26% for DBO. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. LIMI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.

Performance

LIMI vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes Lithium & Battery Metal Miners ETF (LIMI) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIMI achieves a 19.24% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 84.75% return.

LIMI

• 1D: -2.97%
• 1M: -7.76%
• YTD: 19.24%
• 6M: 32.07%
• 1Y: 160.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DBO

• 1D: 2.27%
• 1M: -2.34%
• YTD: 84.75%
• 6M: 81.10%
• 1Y: 80.26%
• 3Y*: 21.86%
• 5Y*: 15.98%
• 10Y*: 11.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LIMI vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
LIMI Themes Lithium & Battery Metal Miners ETF	19.24%	91.22%	-1.18%
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund	84.75%	-11.71%	3.46%

Correlation

The correlation between LIMI and DBO is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2024	-0.00

The correlation between LIMI and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to -0.00 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LIMI vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIMI

LIMI Risk / Return Rank: 89
LIMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
LIMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
LIMI Omega Ratio Rank: 81
LIMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
LIMI Martin Ratio Rank: 91

DBO

DBO Risk / Return Rank: 65
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 60
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIMI vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Lithium & Battery Metal Miners ETF (LIMI) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LIMI	DBO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.71	2.34	+1.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.82	2.94	+0.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.38	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.03	4.44	+2.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.57	9.02	+12.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LIMI vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIMI Sharpe Ratio is 3.71, which is higher than the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIMI and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LIMI	DBO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.71	2.34	+1.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.50	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.36	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.50	0.02	+1.48

Drawdowns

LIMI vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIMI drawdown since its inception was -43.77%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIMI and DBO.

Drawdown Indicators

	LIMI	DBO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.77%	-90.18%	+46.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.00%	-18.19%	-4.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-28.20%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-37.68%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-61.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.69%	-51.38%	+39.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.02%	-62.25%	+49.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.48%	8.92%	-1.44%

Volatility

LIMI vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Themes Lithium & Battery Metal Miners ETF (LIMI) is 9.74%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 12.61%. This indicates that LIMI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LIMI	DBO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.74%	12.61%	-2.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.23%	28.20%	+1.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.66%	34.46%	+9.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	41.41%	32.29%	+9.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.41%	31.78%	+9.63%

LIMI vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

LIMI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

LIMI vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

LIMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than DBO's 1.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund	1.90%	3.51%	4.68%	4.59%	0.66%	0.00%	0.00%	1.63%	1.58%
LIMI Themes Lithium & Battery Metal Miners ETF	0.45%	0.54%	8.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LIMI and DBO in my portfolio?

LIMI and DBO have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LIMI or DBO?

DBO has higher volatility (12.61%) compared to LIMI (9.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIMI dropped -43.77% vs DBO's -90.18%.

Which ETF is better, LIMI or DBO?

On 1-year performance, LIMI leads with 160.78% vs 80.26% for DBO. On fees, LIMI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, LIMI has been the lower-risk option at 9.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LIMI or DBO?

Over the 1-year period, LIMI has performed better with a 160.78% return vs 80.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LIMI or DBO?

LIMI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LIMI or DBO?

DBO has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 0.45% for LIMI.

What is the main difference between LIMI and DBO?

LIMI is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while DBO is Oil & Gas. LIMI tracks BITA Global Lithium and Battery Metals Select Index, while DBO tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: Themes and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for LIMI and 0.78% for DBO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LIMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.71 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.