LIFLX vs. PSECX
LIFLX (Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value Fund) and PSECX (1789 Growth and Income Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, LIFLX returned 10.63%/yr vs 7.14%/yr for PSECX. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LIFLX charges 0.68%/yr vs 2.02%/yr for PSECX.
Performance
LIFLX vs. PSECX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LIFLX achieves a 3.90% return, which is significantly higher than PSECX's 2.12% return.
LIFLX
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 1.76%
- YTD
- 3.90%
- 6M
- 2.82%
- 1Y
- 17.23%
- 3Y*
- 19.69%
- 5Y*
- 10.63%
- 10Y*
- —
PSECX
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -1.68%
- YTD
- 2.12%
- 6M
- 1.60%
- 1Y
- 6.70%
- 3Y*
- 11.60%
- 5Y*
- 7.14%
- 10Y*
- 7.34%
LIFLX vs. PSECX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LIFLX Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value Fund | 3.90% | 19.02% | 21.38% | 14.33% | -9.71% | 28.30% | 5.17% | 5.19% |
PSECX 1789 Growth and Income Fund | 2.12% | 8.04% | 14.49% | 10.64% | -10.66% | 25.43% | 0.78% | 5.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between LIFLX and PSECX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2019 | 0.80 |
The correlation between LIFLX and PSECX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LIFLX vs. PSECX — Risk / Return Rank
LIFLX
PSECX
LIFLX vs. PSECX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value Fund (LIFLX) and 1789 Growth and Income Fund (PSECX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LIFLX | PSECX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.14 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 1.08 | +1.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.84 | 3.77 | +4.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LIFLX vs. PSECX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LIFLX drawdown since its inception was -47.12%, which is greater than PSECX's maximum drawdown of -31.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIFLX and PSECX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LIFLX | PSECX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.12% | -31.13% | -15.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.22% | -7.44% | -0.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.43% | -12.51% | -3.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.94% | -18.47% | -4.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.71% | -3.54% | +2.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.25% | -3.87% | -2.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.32% | 2.12% | +0.20% |
Volatility
LIFLX vs. PSECX - Volatility Comparison
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value Fund (LIFLX) and 1789 Growth and Income Fund (PSECX) have volatilities of 3.17% and 3.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LIFLX | PSECX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.17% | 3.03% | +0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.46% | 7.73% | +0.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.99% | 10.09% | +0.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.39% | 11.97% | +4.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.47% | 13.22% | +10.25% |
LIFLX vs. PSECX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LIFLX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than PSECX's 2.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
LIFLX vs. PSECX - Dividend Comparison
LIFLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than PSECX's 0.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LIFLX Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value Fund | 0.64% | 0.66% | 2.21% | 0.00% | 38.99% | 27.93% | 6.48% | 0.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSECX 1789 Growth and Income Fund | 0.99% | 0.85% | 3.88% | 2.71% | 4.60% | 1.53% | 0.27% | 1.16% | 6.78% | 0.59% | 0.31% | 5.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LIFLX and PSECX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LIFLX has higher volatility (3.17%) compared to PSECX (3.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIFLX dropped -47.12% vs PSECX's -31.13%.
LIFLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LIFLX and PSECX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer