PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LIFE.TO vs. EDGE.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LIFE.TO vs. EDGE.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Evolve Global Healthcare Enhanced Yield Fund (LIFE.TO) and Evolve Innovation Index Fund (EDGE.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIFE.TO achieves a -1.74% return, which is significantly lower than EDGE.TO's 12.54% return.


LIFE.TO

1D
0.68%
1M
3.88%
6M
-3.69%
YTD
-1.74%
1Y
6.84%
3Y*
4.92%
5Y*
4.41%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.58%

EDGE.TO

1D
-0.33%
1M
-3.20%
6M
11.39%
YTD
12.54%
1Y
12.02%
3Y*
14.86%
5Y*
4.25%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$27.25KCA$23.58KCA$26.33K
CA$360.47KCA$315.51KCA$445.64K

LIFE.TO vs. EDGE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LIFE.TO
Evolve Global Healthcare Enhanced Yield Fund
-1.74%12.76%2.20%4.15%0.41%19.76%7.65%25.02%2.24%
EDGE.TO
Evolve Innovation Index Fund
12.54%11.95%17.11%25.65%-33.70%12.46%55.36%33.67%-14.17%

Correlation

The correlation between LIFE.TO and EDGE.TO is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2018

0.31

Over the past year, the correlation between LIFE.TO and EDGE.TO has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.31, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LIFE.TO vs. EDGE.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIFE.TO
LIFE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
LIFE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LIFE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
LIFE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
LIFE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
LIFE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

EDGE.TO
EDGE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
EDGE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDGE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDGE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
EDGE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDGE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIFE.TO vs. EDGE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve Global Healthcare Enhanced Yield Fund (LIFE.TO) and Evolve Innovation Index Fund (EDGE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LIFE.TOEDGE.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.12

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.52

0.66

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.20

1.55

-0.36

LIFE.TO vs. EDGE.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIFE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is comparable to the EDGE.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIFE.TO and EDGE.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LIFE.TO vs. EDGE.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIFE.TO drawdown since its inception was -20.04%, smaller than the maximum EDGE.TO drawdown of -39.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIFE.TO and EDGE.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LIFE.TOEDGE.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.04%

-39.86%

+19.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.29%

-18.43%

+5.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.33%

-21.92%

+5.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.33%

-39.86%

+23.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.67%

-9.10%

+4.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.35%

-12.84%

+8.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.73%

7.77%

-2.04%

Volatility

LIFE.TO vs. EDGE.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Evolve Global Healthcare Enhanced Yield Fund (LIFE.TO) is 5.46%, while Evolve Innovation Index Fund (EDGE.TO) has a volatility of 6.75%. This indicates that LIFE.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EDGE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LIFE.TOEDGE.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.46%

6.75%

-1.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.16%

17.69%

-6.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.75%

20.69%

-5.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.62%

22.81%

-9.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.01%

23.67%

-8.66%

LIFE.TO vs. EDGE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

LIFE.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than EDGE.TO's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

LIFE.TO vs. EDGE.TO - Dividend Comparison

LIFE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.82%, more than EDGE.TO's 0.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
EDGE.TO
Evolve Innovation Index Fund
0.44%0.36%0.53%0.06%0.08%0.05%0.06%0.09%0.09%
LIFE.TO
Evolve Global Healthcare Enhanced Yield Fund
12.82%11.83%10.90%9.24%8.20%6.46%7.09%6.33%4.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


LIFE.TO and EDGE.TO have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LIFE.TO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LIFE.TO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.67% for EDGE.TO.

LIFE.TO is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while EDGE.TO is Technology Equities. LIFE.TO tracks Solactive Global Healthcare 20 Index Canadian Dollar Hedged, while EDGE.TO tracks Solactive Global Innovation Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LIFE.TO and 0.67% for EDGE.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LIFE.TO and EDGE.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer