PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LIFAX vs. LBNDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LIFAX vs. LBNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund Class A (LIFAX) and Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund (LBNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIFAX achieves a 1.22% return, which is significantly higher than LBNDX's 0.17% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LIFAX having a 3.76% annualized return and LBNDX not far ahead at 3.81%.


LIFAX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.17%
6M
0.53%
YTD
1.22%
1Y
2.88%
3Y*
4.65%
5Y*
2.67%
10Y*
3.76%
ALL TIME*
1.96%

LBNDX

1D
0.28%
1M
-1.39%
6M
-0.75%
YTD
0.17%
1Y
4.23%
3Y*
6.05%
5Y*
1.16%
10Y*
3.81%
ALL TIME*
5.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LIFAX vs. LBNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LIFAX
Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund Class A
1.22%7.03%4.53%3.76%-5.57%10.29%5.94%4.87%-1.27%1.34%
LBNDX
Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund
0.17%8.42%6.29%6.38%-13.67%3.25%7.65%13.40%-3.76%9.23%

Correlation

The correlation between LIFAX and LBNDX is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2011

0.44

The correlation between LIFAX and LBNDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LIFAX vs. LBNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LIFAX
LIFAX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
LIFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LIFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
LIFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
LIFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
LIFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

LBNDX
LBNDX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
LBNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LBNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
LBNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
LBNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
LBNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LIFAX vs. LBNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund Class A (LIFAX) and Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund (LBNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LIFAXLBNDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.23

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

1.21

+1.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.82

4.57

+4.25

LIFAX vs. LBNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIFAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the LBNDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIFAX and LBNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LIFAX vs. LBNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIFAX drawdown since its inception was -18.15%, smaller than the maximum LBNDX drawdown of -26.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIFAX and LBNDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LIFAXLBNDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.15%

-26.67%

+8.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.18%

-4.08%

+2.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.03%

-4.51%

+2.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.56%

-17.33%

+8.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.05%

-19.77%

+1.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.72%

-1.79%

+1.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.48%

-3.51%

+0.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.39%

1.07%

-0.68%

Volatility

LIFAX vs. LBNDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund Class A (LIFAX) is 0.49%, while Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund (LBNDX) has a volatility of 0.83%. This indicates that LIFAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LBNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LIFAXLBNDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.49%

0.83%

-0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.82%

3.25%

-1.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35%

4.08%

-1.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.93%

4.71%

-0.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.48%

5.00%

-0.52%

LIFAX vs. LBNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LIFAX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than LBNDX's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

LIFAX vs. LBNDX - Dividend Comparison

LIFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, less than LBNDX's 5.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LBNDX
Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund
5.67%5.92%5.38%4.66%3.67%3.71%3.72%4.02%6.43%4.82%4.58%5.50%
LIFAX
Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund Class A
4.42%4.74%4.00%3.69%2.60%2.35%3.59%3.95%3.95%3.76%4.32%4.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


LIFAX and LBNDX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LBNDX has higher volatility (0.83%) compared to LIFAX (0.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIFAX dropped -18.15% vs LBNDX's -26.67%.

LIFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LIFAX and LBNDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer