PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LIF.TO vs. AQN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LIF.TO vs. AQN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corporation (LIF.TO) and Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. (AQN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIF.TO achieves a -4.40% return, which is significantly lower than AQN.TO's -3.01% return. Over the past 10 years, LIF.TO has outperformed AQN.TO with an annualized return of 20.02%, while AQN.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 1.60% annualized return.


LIF.TO

1D
-2.35%
1M
0.93%
YTD
-4.40%
6M
-6.08%
1Y
0.72%
3Y*
3.90%
5Y*
-0.80%
10Y*
20.02%

AQN.TO

1D
-1.10%
1M
-4.93%
YTD
-3.01%
6M
0.15%
1Y
-0.82%
3Y*
-5.49%
5Y*
-10.28%
10Y*
1.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LIF.TO vs. AQN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LIF.TO
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corporation
-4.40%8.89%0.14%2.89%-1.55%33.21%47.82%17.31%-4.27%67.14%
AQN.TO
Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp.
-3.01%38.63%-17.99%0.64%-48.34%-8.03%19.16%39.68%2.71%29.07%

Correlation

The correlation between LIF.TO and AQN.TO is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 1997

0.13

The correlation between LIF.TO and AQN.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (10 years) to 0.22 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LIF.TO:

CA$1.81B

AQN.TO:

CA$6.26B

EPS

LIF.TO:

CA$1.45

AQN.TO:

CA$0.22

PE Ratio

LIF.TO:

19.52

AQN.TO:

37.04

PS Ratio

LIF.TO:

10.88

AQN.TO:

2.49

PB Ratio

LIF.TO:

2.83

AQN.TO:

1.40

Total Revenue (TTM)

LIF.TO:

CA$165.74M

AQN.TO:

CA$2.52B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LIF.TO:

CA$159.74M

AQN.TO:

CA$924.77M

EBITDA (TTM)

LIF.TO:

CA$93.44M

AQN.TO:

CA$928.99M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LIF.TO vs. AQN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIF.TO
LIF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
LIF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LIF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
LIF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
LIF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
LIF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

AQN.TO
AQN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
AQN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AQN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
AQN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
AQN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
AQN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIF.TO vs. AQN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corporation (LIF.TO) and Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. (AQN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LIF.TOAQN.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.02

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.05

-0.05

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.12

-0.13

+0.25

LIF.TO vs. AQN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.04, which is higher than the AQN.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIF.TO and AQN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LIF.TOAQN.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

-0.03

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

-0.36

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.06

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.26

+0.04

Drawdowns

LIF.TO vs. AQN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIF.TO drawdown since its inception was -76.24%, roughly equal to the maximum AQN.TO drawdown of -78.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIF.TO and AQN.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LIF.TOAQN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.24%

-78.55%

+2.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.38%

-15.89%

+1.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.63%

-41.24%

+24.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.48%

-63.36%

+16.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.86%

-65.21%

+7.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.20%

-51.00%

+29.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.64%

-16.81%

-2.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.05%

7.11%

-1.06%

Volatility

LIF.TO vs. AQN.TO - Volatility Comparison

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corporation (LIF.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.75% compared to Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. (AQN.TO) at 5.26%. This indicates that LIF.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AQN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LIF.TOAQN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.75%

5.26%

+0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.37%

18.45%

-2.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.59%

28.58%

-8.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.33%

28.63%

-0.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.52%

25.92%

+7.60%

Dividends

LIF.TO vs. AQN.TO - Dividend Comparison

LIF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.78%, more than AQN.TO's 4.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AQN.TO
Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp.
4.43%4.29%8.50%6.95%10.66%5.52%3.89%3.96%4.83%4.28%4.82%4.49%
LIF.TO
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corporation
4.78%5.19%10.37%7.99%9.23%15.99%9.35%16.25%7.22%9.74%5.37%10.43%

Financials

LIF.TO vs. AQN.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corporation and Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M20222023202420252026
35.75M
771.54M
(LIF.TO) Total Revenue
(AQN.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

LIF.TO vs. AQN.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corporation and Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
95.9%
22.0%
Portfolio components
LIF.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corporation reported a gross profit of 34.27M and revenue of 35.75M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.9%.

AQN.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. reported a gross profit of 169.97M and revenue of 771.54M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.0%.

LIF.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corporation reported an operating income of 26.53M and revenue of 35.75M, resulting in an operating margin of 74.2%.

AQN.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. reported an operating income of 169.97M and revenue of 771.54M, resulting in an operating margin of 22.0%.

LIF.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corporation reported a net income of 13.20M and revenue of 35.75M, resulting in a net margin of 36.9%.

AQN.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. reported a net income of 84.79M and revenue of 771.54M, resulting in a net margin of 11.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LIF.TO and AQN.TO have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LIF.TO and AQN.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer