PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LICYX vs. LAGWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LICYX vs. LAGWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett International Equity Fund (LICYX) and Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund (LAGWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LICYX achieves a 19.01% return, which is significantly lower than LAGWX's 31.21% return. Over the past 10 years, LICYX has underperformed LAGWX with an annualized return of 9.97%, while LAGWX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.84% annualized return.


LICYX

1D
-0.60%
1M
5.71%
YTD
19.01%
6M
21.21%
1Y
32.53%
3Y*
21.76%
5Y*
9.52%
10Y*
9.97%

LAGWX

1D
0.03%
1M
5.85%
YTD
31.21%
6M
26.95%
1Y
59.61%
3Y*
21.73%
5Y*
4.65%
10Y*
14.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LICYX vs. LAGWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LICYX
Lord Abbett International Equity Fund
19.01%31.78%9.57%12.57%-18.62%11.80%17.30%21.73%-17.91%25.52%
LAGWX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund
31.21%14.37%21.89%8.50%-36.09%-2.77%72.40%31.47%4.52%29.92%

Correlation

The correlation between LICYX and LAGWX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2004

0.64

The correlation between LICYX and LAGWX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LICYX vs. LAGWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LICYX
LICYX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
LICYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LICYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
LICYX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
LICYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
LICYX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

LAGWX
LAGWX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
LAGWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LAGWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
LAGWX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
LAGWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
LAGWX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LICYX vs. LAGWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett International Equity Fund (LICYX) and Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund (LAGWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LICYXLAGWXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.38

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

4.18

-1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.01

15.56

-5.55

LICYX vs. LAGWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LICYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the LAGWX Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LICYX and LAGWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LICYXLAGWXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

2.32

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.17

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.55

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.50

-0.14

Drawdowns

LICYX vs. LAGWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LICYX drawdown since its inception was -59.02%, roughly equal to the maximum LAGWX drawdown of -60.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LICYX and LAGWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LICYXLAGWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.02%

-60.31%

+1.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.35%

-14.72%

+1.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.46%

-32.10%

+17.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.99%

-51.25%

+20.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.90%

-54.38%

+18.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.60%

-0.33%

-0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.88%

-17.07%

+4.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

3.94%

-0.60%

Volatility

LICYX vs. LAGWX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lord Abbett International Equity Fund (LICYX) is 6.67%, while Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund (LAGWX) has a volatility of 9.55%. This indicates that LICYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LAGWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LICYXLAGWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.67%

9.55%

-2.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.37%

21.44%

-6.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.76%

26.52%

-8.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.72%

27.66%

-10.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.24%

27.24%

-10.00%

LICYX vs. LAGWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LICYX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than LAGWX's 0.93% expense ratio.


Dividends

LICYX vs. LAGWX - Dividend Comparison

LICYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, while LAGWX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LAGWX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.03%0.00%0.00%12.60%9.67%22.87%33.87%0.00%0.00%10.03%
LICYX
Lord Abbett International Equity Fund
4.43%5.28%4.52%1.98%2.28%12.73%1.33%1.68%2.47%2.17%2.52%1.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


LICYX and LAGWX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LAGWX has higher volatility (9.55%) compared to LICYX (6.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LICYX dropped -59.02% vs LAGWX's -60.31%.

LAGWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LICYX and LAGWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer