PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LICYX vs. FISZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LICYX vs. FISZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett International Equity Fund (LICYX) and Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund (FISZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LICYX achieves a 19.73% return, which is significantly lower than FISZX's 27.01% return.


LICYX

1D
0.69%
1M
8.09%
YTD
19.73%
6M
21.93%
1Y
34.18%
3Y*
22.00%
5Y*
9.83%
10Y*
10.03%

FISZX

1D
0.37%
1M
11.60%
YTD
27.01%
6M
32.57%
1Y
42.44%
3Y*
22.28%
5Y*
8.95%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LICYX vs. FISZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
LICYX
Lord Abbett International Equity Fund
19.73%31.78%9.57%12.57%-18.62%11.80%17.30%8.71%
FISZX
Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund
27.01%31.77%3.61%15.83%-28.32%9.91%23.49%13.42%

Correlation

The correlation between LICYX and FISZX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2019

0.89

The correlation between LICYX and FISZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LICYX vs. FISZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LICYX
LICYX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
LICYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LICYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
LICYX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
LICYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
LICYX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

FISZX
FISZX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
FISZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FISZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
FISZX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
FISZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FISZX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LICYX vs. FISZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett International Equity Fund (LICYX) and Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund (FISZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LICYXFISZXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.89

2.21

-0.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.61

3.01

-0.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.40

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

2.89

-0.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.02

11.38

-1.36

LICYX vs. FISZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LICYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the FISZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LICYX and FISZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LICYXFISZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

2.21

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.50

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.65

-0.29

Drawdowns

LICYX vs. FISZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LICYX drawdown since its inception was -59.02%, which is greater than FISZX's maximum drawdown of -39.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LICYX and FISZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LICYXFISZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.02%

-39.92%

-19.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.35%

-14.48%

+1.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.46%

-14.63%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.99%

-39.92%

+8.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.88%

-12.37%

-0.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

3.66%

-0.32%

Volatility

LICYX vs. FISZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lord Abbett International Equity Fund (LICYX) is 6.66%, while Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund (FISZX) has a volatility of 7.78%. This indicates that LICYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FISZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LICYXFISZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.66%

7.78%

-1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.37%

16.22%

-0.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.77%

18.93%

-1.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.72%

17.84%

-1.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.24%

18.27%

-1.03%

LICYX vs. FISZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LICYX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than FISZX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

LICYX vs. FISZX - Dividend Comparison

LICYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, more than FISZX's 1.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FISZX
Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund
1.52%1.92%2.55%1.89%1.37%6.08%0.90%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LICYX
Lord Abbett International Equity Fund
4.41%5.28%4.52%1.98%2.28%12.73%1.33%1.68%2.47%2.17%2.52%1.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, LICYX and FISZX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FISZX has higher volatility (7.78%) compared to LICYX (6.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LICYX dropped -59.02% vs FISZX's -39.92%.

FISZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LICYX and FISZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer