LIBD vs. VTIP
LIBD (LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF) and VTIP (Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds. LIBD is actively managed, while VTIP is passively managed. Over the past year, LIBD returned -2.03% vs 3.09% for VTIP. Their 0.48 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. LIBD charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTIP.
Performance
LIBD vs. VTIP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LIBD achieves a -2.94% return, which is significantly lower than VTIP's 1.83% return.
LIBD
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -3.26%
- 6M
- -2.95%
- YTD
- -2.94%
- 1Y
- -2.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -2.29%
VTIP
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- 6M
- 1.28%
- YTD
- 1.83%
- 1Y
- 3.09%
- 3Y*
- 5.11%
- 5Y*
- 3.06%
- 10Y*
- 3.10%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.21%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $6.78K | $11.16K | $6.65K | |
| $104.26M | $116.98M | $124.63M |
LIBD vs. VTIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LIBD LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF | -2.94% | -0.63% |
VTIP Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 1.83% | 6.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between LIBD and VTIP is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 2025 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LIBD vs. VTIP — Risk / Return Rank
LIBD
VTIP
LIBD vs. VTIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF (LIBD) and Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LIBD | VTIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.46 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.18 | 4.93 | -5.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.38 | 15.25 | -15.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LIBD vs. VTIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LIBD drawdown since its inception was -7.31%, which is greater than VTIP's maximum drawdown of -6.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIBD and VTIP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LIBD | VTIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.31% | -6.27% | -1.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.96% | -0.71% | -6.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -5.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -6.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.96% | -0.23% | -6.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.46% | -1.03% | -2.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.40% | 0.23% | +3.17% |
Volatility
LIBD vs. VTIP - Volatility Comparison
LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF (LIBD) has a higher volatility of 1.81% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTIP) at 0.41%. This indicates that LIBD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LIBD | VTIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.81% | 0.41% | +1.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.85% | 1.22% | +4.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.85% | 1.57% | +6.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.94% | 2.76% | +7.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.94% | 2.74% | +7.20% |
LIBD vs. VTIP - Expense Ratio Comparison
LIBD has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VTIP's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LIBD vs. VTIP - Dividend Comparison
LIBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.89%, more than VTIP's 4.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LIBD LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF | 11.89% | 13.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTIP Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 4.15% | 3.81% | 2.70% | 2.86% | 6.84% | 4.68% | 1.20% | 1.95% | 2.45% | 1.52% | 0.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LIBD and VTIP have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LIBD has higher volatility (1.81%) compared to VTIP (0.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIBD dropped -7.31% vs VTIP's -6.27%.
On 1-year performance, VTIP leads with 3.09% vs -2.03% for LIBD. On fees, VTIP is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTIP has been the lower-risk option at 0.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VTIP has performed better with a 3.09% return vs -2.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTIP is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for LIBD.
LIBD has the higher dividend yield at 11.89%, compared with 4.15% for VTIP.
They also come from different issuers: Stone Ridge and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for LIBD and 0.03% for VTIP.
VTIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LIBD and VTIP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer