PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LIBD vs. IBIE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LIBD vs. IBIE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF (LIBD) and iShares iBonds Oct 2028 Term TIPS ETF (IBIE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIBD achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly lower than IBIE's 2.10% return.


LIBD

1D
-0.40%
1M
0.93%
YTD
0.48%
6M
-1.01%
1Y
3.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBIE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.23%
YTD
2.10%
6M
2.07%
1Y
4.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LIBD vs. IBIE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LIBD and IBIE is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2025

0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LIBD vs. IBIE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIBD
LIBD Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
LIBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LIBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
LIBD Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
LIBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
LIBD Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIE
IBIE Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
IBIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIE Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIE Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIBD vs. IBIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF (LIBD) and iShares iBonds Oct 2028 Term TIPS ETF (IBIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LIBDIBIEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.69

-0.60

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.63

8.73

-8.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.36

25.70

-24.34

LIBD vs. IBIE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIBD Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is lower than the IBIE Sharpe Ratio of 3.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIBD and IBIE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LIBDIBIEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

3.09

-2.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

2.02

-1.73

Drawdowns

LIBD vs. IBIE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIBD drawdown since its inception was -7.31%, which is greater than IBIE's maximum drawdown of -1.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIBD and IBIE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LIBDIBIEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.31%

-1.70%

-5.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.19%

-0.55%

-5.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.69%

0.00%

-3.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.20%

-0.39%

-2.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

0.19%

+2.70%

Volatility

LIBD vs. IBIE - Volatility Comparison

LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF (LIBD) has a higher volatility of 2.14% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2028 Term TIPS ETF (IBIE) at 0.38%. This indicates that LIBD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LIBDIBIEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.14%

0.38%

+1.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.64%

0.97%

+4.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.08%

1.56%

+6.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.64%

2.86%

+6.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.64%

2.86%

+6.78%

LIBD vs. IBIE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LIBD has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIE's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LIBD vs. IBIE - Dividend Comparison

LIBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.50%, more than IBIE's 3.25% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
IBIE
iShares iBonds Oct 2028 Term TIPS ETF
3.25%4.09%4.23%0.75%
LIBD
LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF
11.50%13.52%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LIBD and IBIE have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LIBD has higher volatility (2.14%) compared to IBIE (0.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIBD dropped -7.31% vs IBIE's -1.70%.

On 1-year performance, IBIE leads with 4.80% vs 3.91% for LIBD. On fees, IBIE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIE has been the lower-risk option at 0.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IBIE has performed better with a 4.80% return vs 3.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for LIBD.

LIBD has the higher dividend yield at 11.50%, compared with 3.25% for IBIE.

They also come from different issuers: Stone Ridge and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for LIBD and 0.10% for IBIE.

IBIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LIBD and IBIE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer