LIBD vs. DBO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LIBD (LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - LIBD is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund actively managed by Stone Ridge, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. LIBD is actively managed, while DBO is passively managed. Over the past year, LIBD returned 3.91% vs 80.26% for DBO. At a correlation of -0.26, they often move in opposite directions. LIBD charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.

Performance

LIBD vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF (LIBD) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIBD achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 84.75% return.

LIBD

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: 0.93%
• YTD: 0.48%
• 6M: -1.01%
• 1Y: 3.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DBO

• 1D: 2.27%
• 1M: -2.34%
• YTD: 84.75%
• 6M: 81.10%
• 1Y: 80.26%
• 3Y*: 21.86%
• 5Y*: 15.98%
• 10Y*: 11.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LIBD vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LIBD LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF	0.48%	3.37%
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund	84.75%	-13.40%

Correlation

The correlation between LIBD and DBO is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2025	-0.26

Return for Risk

LIBD vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIBD

LIBD Risk / Return Rank: 16
LIBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
LIBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
LIBD Omega Ratio Rank: 15
LIBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
LIBD Martin Ratio Rank: 16

DBO

DBO Risk / Return Rank: 65
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 60
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIBD vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF (LIBD) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LIBD	DBO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.49	2.34	-1.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.75	2.94	-2.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.38	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.63	4.44	-3.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.36	9.02	-7.67
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LIBD vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIBD Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is lower than the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIBD and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LIBD	DBO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49	2.34	-1.86
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.50	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.36	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.29	0.02	+0.26

Drawdowns

LIBD vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIBD drawdown since its inception was -7.31%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIBD and DBO.

Drawdown Indicators

	LIBD	DBO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.31%	-90.18%	+82.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.19%	-18.19%	+12.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-28.20%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-37.68%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-61.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.69%	-51.38%	+47.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.20%	-62.25%	+59.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.89%	8.92%	-6.03%

Volatility

LIBD vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF (LIBD) is 2.14%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 12.61%. This indicates that LIBD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LIBD	DBO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.14%	12.61%	-10.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.64%	28.20%	-22.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.08%	34.46%	-26.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.64%	32.29%	-22.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.64%	31.78%	-22.14%

LIBD vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

LIBD has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

LIBD vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

LIBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.50%, more than DBO's 1.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund	1.90%	3.51%	4.68%	4.59%	0.66%	0.00%	0.00%	1.63%	1.58%
LIBD LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF	11.50%	13.52%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LIBD and DBO in my portfolio?

LIBD and DBO have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LIBD or DBO?

DBO has higher volatility (12.61%) compared to LIBD (2.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIBD dropped -7.31% vs DBO's -90.18%.

Which ETF is better, LIBD or DBO?

On 1-year performance, DBO leads with 80.26% vs 3.91% for LIBD. On fees, LIBD is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, LIBD has been the lower-risk option at 2.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LIBD or DBO?

Over the 1-year period, DBO has performed better with a 80.26% return vs 3.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LIBD or DBO?

LIBD is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LIBD or DBO?

LIBD has the higher dividend yield at 11.50%, compared with 1.90% for DBO.

What is the main difference between LIBD and DBO?

LIBD is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Stone Ridge and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for LIBD and 0.78% for DBO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.