LIBD vs. BLTD

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

LIBD (LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF) and BLTD (Bluemonte Long Term Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LIBD is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund actively managed by Stone Ridge, while BLTD is a Long-Term Bond fund managed by Bluemonte. Over the past year, LIBD returned 2.29% vs 4.79% for BLTD. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LIBD charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for BLTD.

Performance

LIBD vs. BLTD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF (LIBD) and Bluemonte Long Term Bond ETF (BLTD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIBD achieves a 0.44% return, which is significantly lower than BLTD's 0.84% return.

LIBD

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 0.95%
• YTD: 0.44%
• 6M: 0.30%
• 1Y: 2.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BLTD

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 1.46%
• YTD: 0.84%
• 6M: 0.77%
• 1Y: 4.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LIBD vs. BLTD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LIBD LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF	0.44%	1.82%
BLTD Bluemonte Long Term Bond ETF	0.84%	3.76%

Correlation

The correlation between LIBD and BLTD is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2025	0.92

The correlation between LIBD and BLTD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LIBD vs. BLTD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIBD

LIBD Risk / Return Rank: 12
LIBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
LIBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
LIBD Omega Ratio Rank: 11
LIBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
LIBD Martin Ratio Rank: 12

BLTD

BLTD Risk / Return Rank: 21
BLTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
BLTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
BLTD Omega Ratio Rank: 18
BLTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
BLTD Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIBD vs. BLTD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF (LIBD) and Bluemonte Long Term Bond ETF (BLTD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LIBD	BLTD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.29	0.70	-0.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.46	1.05	-0.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.12	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.37	1.00	-0.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.76	2.48	-1.71

LIBD vs. BLTD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIBD Sharpe Ratio is 0.29, which is lower than the BLTD Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIBD and BLTD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LIBD vs. BLTD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIBD drawdown since its inception was -7.31%, which is greater than BLTD's maximum drawdown of -4.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIBD and BLTD.

Drawdown Indicators

	LIBD	BLTD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.31%	-4.80%	-2.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.19%	-4.80%	-1.39%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.73%	-1.92%	-1.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.35%	-1.60%	-1.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.00%	1.94%	+1.06%

Volatility

LIBD vs. BLTD - Volatility Comparison

LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF (LIBD) has a higher volatility of 2.02% compared to Bluemonte Long Term Bond ETF (BLTD) at 1.70%. This indicates that LIBD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLTD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LIBD	BLTD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.02%	1.70%	+0.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.77%	5.04%	+0.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.92%	6.82%	+1.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.08%	6.82%	+3.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.08%	6.82%	+3.26%

LIBD vs. BLTD - Expense Ratio Comparison

LIBD has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than BLTD's 0.23% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

LIBD vs. BLTD - Dividend Comparison

LIBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.51%, more than BLTD's 3.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BLTD Bluemonte Long Term Bond ETF	3.91%	2.48%
LIBD LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF	11.51%	13.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LIBD and BLTD in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, LIBD and BLTD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, LIBD or BLTD?

LIBD has higher volatility (2.02%) compared to BLTD (1.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIBD dropped -7.31% vs BLTD's -4.80%.

Which ETF is better, LIBD or BLTD?

On 1-year performance, BLTD leads with 4.79% vs 2.29% for LIBD. On fees, BLTD is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, BLTD has been the lower-risk option at 1.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LIBD or BLTD?

Over the 1-year period, BLTD has performed better with a 4.79% return vs 2.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LIBD or BLTD?

BLTD is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for LIBD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LIBD or BLTD?

LIBD has the higher dividend yield at 11.51%, compared with 3.91% for BLTD.

What is the main difference between LIBD and BLTD?

LIBD is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while BLTD is Long-Term Bond. They also come from different issuers: Stone Ridge and Bluemonte. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for LIBD and 0.23% for BLTD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BLTD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.70 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.